Recent non-interventional advances in cancer pain among Singapore patients

<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>Pain is a common symptom in cancer patients, but very little information about the prevalence, severity, and treatment of pain in cancer patients in Singapore is available. Therefore, our prospective survey in the National Cancer Centre (NCC) outpatients is incorporated in this report. In addition, a review concerning the recent advances on non-interventional pain management in cancer treatment, which is relevant in the context, is discussed.</p><p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS</b>For the prospective survey, a questionnaire was distributed for self-administration by patients while waiting for consultation at the NCC outpatient departments. Literature searches on advances in pain management were conducted, reviewed and discussed.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>In the last decade, there have been advances in pain pharmacology ranging from wider therapeutic options and management approaches to novel delivery techniques. Acupuncture and massage therapy became increasingly popular among cancer patients. Some clinical trials of acupuncture show benefits in palliation of cancer pain. From the prospective survey, 41.2% of the responders reported pain in the past week, and only 70.8% talked to their doctors about their pain. One third of the patients received analgesics. Of these, 86.5% said that they were taking the prescribed medications, however, 37.4% admitted to having difficulties taking them. Non-drug methods were used by 25.4% of the patients. Medicated oil, cream or gel was used by 49.3%; only 2.6% reported use of Chinese herbs.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Pain is a significant symptom in outpatients attending a cancer centre, affecting 41.2% of the patients. Although majority of patients who suffered from pain reported this to doctors, much more medical effort is needed to help patients to relieve their pain and proper complementary therapy could be considered.</p>

Opioid use amongst cancer patients at the end of life

<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>Concerns about the life shortening effect of opioids is a well known fact in the medical world when considering administration of these drugs for symptom alleviation at end of life. This study described the patterns of opioid use among cancer patients referred to a hospital-based specialist palliative care service for symptom management. This study also examined whether opioid use among terminally ill cancer patients during the last 2 days of life had any influence on survival.</p><p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS</b>A retrospective review of case notes of patients who were diagnosed with terminal cancer and had passed away in a 95-bedded oncology ward between September 2006 and September 2007 was conducted. Data were collected on patients' characteristics and patterns of opioid use including opioid doses and dose changes at 48 hours and 24 hours before death.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>There were 238 patients who received specialist palliative care, of whom 132 (55.5%) were females. At 48 hours and 24 hours before death, 184 (77.3%) patients and 187 (78.6%) patients had received opioids, respectively. The median daily doses at 48 hours and 24 hours were 48 mg and 57 mg oral morphine equivalent doses (OME), respectively. Indications for opioid use were pain (41.1%), dyspnoea, (29.1%) and both dyspnoea and pain (30.8%). In the fi nal 24 hours, 22.3% patients had a reduction in their mean opioid dose while 22.7% required an increase in their mean opioid dose. Increased age was associated with decreasing opioid doses (P = 0.003). Patients with spinal metastases required higher doses of opioids (P = 0.03) while those with lung metastases required lower doses (P = 0.011). Survival analysis using Kaplan-Meier survival curve revealed no significant survival difference between those who were on opioids and those who were not. Log rank test (Mantel-Cox) (P = 0.69).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Our results showed that opioids are safe medications for symptom alleviation in terminally ill cancer patients during the last days of life and have no deleterious influence on survival.</p>

Measurement properties of the Chinese language version of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-general in a Singaporean population

<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>Health-related quality of life is an important aspect of health outcome. The assessment of it must be done by validated instruments. There is no published data on the validity, reliability and sensitiveness to change of the official Chinese translation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (version 4; FACT-G).</p><p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS</b>A Chinese questionnaire package comprising the FACT-G and Functional Living Index-Cancer (FLIC, which was translated, modified and validated in Singapore) was filled in by 165 ethnic Chinese patients recruited from the National Cancer Centre, Singapore. Four weeks later, the patients were assessed again by a postal questionnaire survey.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The FACT-G and FLIC total scores were strongly correlated (r = 0.85). The Physical, Social/Family, Emotional and Functional Well-being scales of the FACT-G converged to and diverged from FLIC components as conceptually expected. The FACT-G and its 4 scales also demonstrated known-groups validity in differentiating patients with different performance status (each P <0.001). Their internal consistency ranged from 0.81 to 0.93 and test-retest reliability ranged from 0.74 to 0.85. The FACT-G and its Physical, Emotional and Functional Well-being scales showed trends of change in relation to change in performance status. The Social/Family Well-being scale was sensitive to decline but not improvement in performance status.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>The Chinese version of the FACT-G can be used to assess overall level and some specific aspects of health-related quality of life. However, researchers should be cautious in using this instrument to specifically investigate the social aspect of quality of life.</p>