Rhamnus crenata leaf extracts exhibit anti-inflammatory activity via modulating the Nrf2/HO-1 and NF-κB/MAPK signaling pathways

Objective: To elucidate the potential anti-inflammatory mechanisms of Rhamnus crenata leaf extracts using RAW264.7 cells. Methods: We used 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5 diphenyl tetrazolium bromide assay to measure cell viability. Nitric oxide (NO) production was measured using Griess reagent. Western blotting and RT-PCR assays were carried out for analyzing the protein and gene expressions of pro-inflammatory mediators, respectively. Moreover, PD98059 (ERK1/2 inhibitor), SB203580 (p38 inhibitor), SP600125 (JNK inhibitor), and BAY11-7082 (NF-κB inhibitor) were used to evaluate the anti-inflammatory mechanism of Rhamnus crenata leaf extract. Results: Rhamnus crenata leaf extracts significantly inhibited the production of the pro-inflammatory mediators such as NO, iNOS, COX-2, IL-1β, and TNF-α in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated RAW264.7 cells. Rhamnus crenata leaf extracts also suppressed LPS-induced degradation of IκB-α and nuclear accumulation of p65, which resulted in the inhibition of NF-κB activation in RAW264.7 cells. Additionally, the extracts attenuated the phosphorylation of p38, ERK1/2, and JNK in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells. Moreover, HO-1 expression induced by Rhamnus crenata leaf extracts was significantly downregulated by SB230580, PD98059, SP600125 and BAY11-7082. Conclusions: Rhamnus crenata leaf extract may upregulate HO-1 expression through inhibition of p38, ERK1/2, and NF-κB activation, which may contribute to the anti-inflammatory activity of the extracts. Rhamnus crenata leaf extracts may have great potential for the development of anti-inflammatory drugs to treat acute and chronic inflammatory diseases.

Secondary nipple reconstruction using two surgical techniques

Background@#Although the initial projection after primary nipple reconstruction is excellent, nipple projection gradually flattens in most cases due to multiple causes. Although various methods have been reported to rebuild the nipple after nipple flattening, the most effective method of secondary nipple reconstruction remains unknown. The aim of this study was to review our institution’s experiences with secondary nipple reconstruction. @*Methods@#We conducted a retrospective review from March 2012 to January 2019. We performed secondary nipple reconstruction if the primary reconstructed nipple height differed by more than 6 mm from the normal nipple height. We chose the method of nipple revision according to the degree of tissue scarring and the remaining nipple projection. @*Results@#We performed secondary nipple reconstruction on a total of 27 nipples, using pursestring sutures for 19 nipples and star flaps in eight nipples. The median follow-up period was 8 months (range, 6–19 months) after the final nipple reconstruction. Among the 19 nipples reconstructed using purse-string sutures, 10 (53%) demonstrated acceptable projection of more than 5 mm. Among the eight nipples reconstructed using star flaps, six (75%) showed acceptable projection of more than 5 mm. Most of the patients (73%) were satisfied (scores of 4 or 5) with the nipple reconstruction overall. @*Conclusions@#Few studies have presented favorable outcomes of secondary nipple reconstruction. When the star flap and purse-string suture methods were used depending on the remaining nipple height and scarring, appropriate projection could be achieved.