ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the clinical effect of edaravone on acute ischemic cerebrovascular disease ,and to observe its effect on serum C‐reactive protein (CRP) and matrix metalloproteinase‐9(MMP‐9) level .Methods Eighty four patients with acute ischemic cerebral vascular disease who were treated in our hospital during 2012 May to 2013 December were selected and divided in‐to observation group and control group ,with 42 cases in each group .The control group was treated with anti‐platelet ,regulating blood pressure and blood lipid ,reducing intracranial pressure ,improve microcirculation and other comprehensive treatment ;the pa‐tients in observation group were treated with increased dose of edaravone on the basis of the control group .America national institu‐tes of health stroke scale(NIHSS) and activities of daily living scale (ADL) were used to evaluate the neurological function and ac‐tivities of daily living ability of patients before and after the treatment ,the CRP and MMP‐9 level were detected before and after treatment ,and the adverse reaction during the treatment was recorded .Results After one week and two weeks after treatment , there were significant differences between treatment group and control group in the NIHSS score and ADL score (P0 .05) .Conclusion Edaravone could improve the clinical treatment effect of acute ischemic cerebrovascular disease ,and reducing se‐rum CRP and MMP‐9 level mechanism pathway might be involved in the regulation of its pharmacodynamics .
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:To observe the clinical efficacy of Nimodipine for patients with cerebral hemorrhage.METHODS: A total of 60 patients with cerebral hemorrhage were randomly divided into treatment group and control group.The treatment group were given nimodipine plus the routine therapy while the control group received routine therapy alone.The clinical neurologic impairment scores(CCS) and clinical effects of two groups were observed before treatment and at 14 days after treatment.RESULTS:At 14 days after treatment,the neurologic impairment score(CCS) in the treatment group was significantly lower than in the control group(13.6?8.1 vs.17.8?8.3,P