ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE：To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of guselkumab in the treatment of moderate-to- severe plaque psoriasis ，and to provide evidence-based reference for the clinical treatment. METHODS ：Retrieved from PubMed ， Embase，Cochrane Library ，CNKI，VIP，Wanfang database during inception to Oct. 2019，randomized controlled trials （RCTs） about guselkumab versus placebo/positive control in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis were collected. After literature screening and data extraction ，quality evaluation was performed by using the bias risk evaluation tool recommended by the Cochrane System evaluator manual 5.1.0. Meta-analysis was performed by using Stata 16.0 software. RESULTS ：Eight RCTs with a total of 3 488 patients were included. The results of Meta-analysis indicated that the proportion of patients who achieved 90％ reduction or more from baseline of psoriasis area and severity index （PASI）in guselkumab group was significantly higher than that placebo group [RR ＝26.72，95％CI（15.98，44.70），P＜0.001]，adaliumumab group [RR ＝1.45，95％CI（1.32，1.59）， P＜0.001] and secukinumab group （P＜0.000 1）. The proportion of patients with Investigator ’s Global Assessment （IGA）score of 0 or 1 in guselkumab group was significantly better than placebo group [RR ＝11.15，95％ CI（8.22，15.14），P＜0.001] and adaliumumab group [RR ＝1.27，95％CI（1.19，1.35），P＜0.001]. The proportion of patients with IGA score of 0，the proportion of patients who achieved 75％ reduction or more from baseline of PASI ，dermatology life qu ality index score of 0 or 1 in guselkumab group were signifi cantly superior than placebo group and adaliumumab gr oup，the proportion of patients who achieved 100％ reduction from baseline of PASI in guselkumab group Lewx- was significantly superior than placebo group （P＜0.05）， inn@outlook.com there was no significant difference compared with adaliumumab group （P＞0.05）. There was no statistical significance in the proportion of patients with IGA score of and other secondary outcome indicators between guselkumab and secukinumab group （P＞0.05）. In the safety indicators as total incidence rate of ADR ，rate of withdrawl due to ADR ，etc. ，there was no statistical significance between guselkumab and placebo/ adalimumab groups （P＞0.05）. CONCLUSIONS ：Guselkumab is superior to placebo ，adaliumumab and secukinumab in improving the symptoms of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis with good safety .
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE：To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of pe ficitinib for treating rheumatoid arthritis （RA），and to provide evidence-based reference for the clinical treatment of RA. METHODS ：Retrieved from PubMed ，Embase， The Cochrane Library ，CJFD，VIP and Wanfang database during from their establishment to September 2019，randomized controlled trials （RCTs）about the efficacy and safety of Peficitinib （trial group ）versus placebo （control group ）in the treatment of RA were collected. The risk of bias assessment tool provided in Cochrane System Evaluator Manual 5.1.0 was used to evaluate the quality after data extracted from clinical studies which met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of the efficacy [the proportion of patients who met the American College of Rheumatology 20％ improvement criteria （ACR20），ACR50，ACR70，the proportion of the patients with 28 joint disease activity index ＜2.6 calculated by erythrocyte sedimentation rate （DAS28-ESR＜2.6），the proportion of patients with 28 joint disease activity index ＜2.6 calculated by C-reactive protein （DAS28-CRP＜2.6），etc.] and safety（incidence of total ADR ）was performed by using Stata 16 statistical software. RESULTS ：Totally 5 RCTs were included ， 药学。E-mail：hyl3160131@163.com 5.11），P＜0.001]，150 mg[RR＝3.52，95％CI（1.78，6.96），P＜ 0.001]}，ACR70{total [RR ＝2.51，95％CI（1.52，4.14），P＜0.001]，100 mg[RR＝3.50，95％CI（1.62，7.58），P＝0.001]，150 mg [RR＝4.59，95％CI（1.47，14.30），P＝0.009]}，DAS28-ESR＜2.6{total [RR ＝4.83，95％CI（3.20，7.28），P＜0.001]，100 mg[RR＝ 5.37，95％CI（2.68，10.77），P＜0.001]，150 mg[RR＝7.44，95％CI（3.78，14.65），P＜0.001]} and DAS 28-CRP＜2.6{total [RR ＝3.41， 95％CI（2.65，4.39），P＜0.001]，100 mg[RR＝4.00，95％CI（2.67，5.99），P＜0.001]，150 mg[RR＝4.45，95％CI（2.99，6.63），P＜ 0.001]} in trial group were significantly higher than control group ，with statistical significance. In term of safety ，there was no statistical significance in the incidence of total ADR [RR ＝1.05，95％ CI（0.94，1.16），P＝0.395] between 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS：For the treatment of RA ，100 mg or 150 mg peficitinib once per day is superior to placebo in terms of ACR 20， ACR50 and ACR 70，DAS28-ESR＜2.6，DAS28-CRP＜2.6； the adverse events are mild and tolerable and it may be a new treatment option for RA.