Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Indian J Med Microbiol ; 2022 Jun; 40(2): 279-284
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-222837

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Identifying asymptomatic SARS-COV-2 carriage is one of the crucial factors in controlling the COVID 19 pandemic. The relationship between the asymptomatic viral carriage and the rate of seroconversion needs better understanding. The present study was conducted to identify the asymptomatic COVID-19 infection and seropositivity in high-risk contacts in the southern district of Delhi, India. Methods: Following the screening of 6961 subjects, a total of 407 asymptomatic high-risk subjects were selected. Demographic data, socioeconomic status, and history of COVID-19 related symptoms in the last 4 months were recorded. Blood samples and Nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swabs were collected for the detection of SARSCOV-2 RNA and anti-SARS-COV-2 antibodies. Results: 55 asymptomatic high-risk subjects (13.5%) tested positive for SARS-COV-2 infection and among them, 70.9% remained asymptomatic throughout their course of infection. The seropositivity among the subjects was 28.9% (n ¼ 118) and was found significantly higher among lower-middle socioeconomic strata (p ¼ 0.01). The antibody levels were significantly higher (p ¼ 0.033) in individuals with a previous history of COVID-19 like symptoms as compared to the subjects, who had no such history. Asymptomatic healthcare workers showed a significantly increased rate of SARS-COV-2 infection (p ¼ 0.004) and seropositivity (p ¼ 0.005) as compared to the non-healthcare workers. Subjects, who were exposed to infection at their workplace (non-hospital setting) had the least RT-PCR positivity rate (p ¼ 0.03). Conclusions: A large proportion of SARS-COV-2 infection remains completely asymptomatic. The rate of asymptomatic carriage and seropositivity is significantly higher in healthcare workers as compared to the general population. The level of SARS-COV-2 antibodies is directly related to the appearance of symptoms. These observations may contribute to redefining COVID 19 screening, infection control, and professional health practice strategies.

2.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-223613

ABSTRACT

Background & objectives: Infections caused by vancomycin-resistant Enterococci are difficult to treat given the limited therapeutic alternatives. Different gene clusters are known to confer vancomycin resistance. vanA and vanB genes are transferable and are clinically relevant. This cross-sectional study aimed to identify the vancomycin-resistant genotypes in the strains causing urinary tract infection and also to test the in vitro efficacy of linezolid and pristinamycin against the vancomycin-resistant isolates. Methods: Antimicrobial resistance profile of 118 enterococcal isolates was evaluated. Minimum inhibitory concentration of vancomycin, teicoplanin and high-level gentamicin (HLG) was determined by micro broth dilution. The vancomycin-resistant isolates were tested against linezolid and pristinamycin by micro-broth dilution and E strip method. The presence of vancomycin-resistant genes was detected by multiplex polymerase chain reaction and was sequenced and analyzed. Results: Most commonly isolated species were Enterococcus faecalis (76.9%) and Enterococcus faecium (16.9%). It was found that 43 per cent of the isolates were resistant to HLG and 16.9 per cent to vancomycin. Higher resistance was seen against fluoroquinolones, erythromycin, tetracycline and ?-lactam drugs. However, 5.08 per cent strains were resistant to tigecycline. All vancomycin-resistant strains were sensitive to pristinamycin and one was resistant to linezolid. vanA and vanB gene were found in 15 and five isolates, respectively. The gene sequences were submitted to NCBI gene bank and accession numbers were obtained. Interpretation & conclusions: The present study showed prevalence of vanA and vanB genes carrying Enterococcus in a tertiary care centre in north India. The emergence of resistance against drugs such as tigecycline and linezolid is a topic of concern as it will be a therapeutic challenge for physicians.

3.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-175651

ABSTRACT

Background: Increasing Carbapenem resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an emerging threat and a matter of particular concern. Aim: Our study was conducted to find out the prevalence of Metallo beta lactamase producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and compare various phenotypic MBL detection methods. Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 86 non duplicate Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from clinical specimens for a period of 2 year from April 2011 to march 2013. Total 86 isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa were included in the study. All clinical samples were processed according to standard microbiological method. The MIC for Imipenem and Meropenem were determined by broth dilution method. As per CLSI any isolate having an MIC of >8μg/ml was considered resistant.42 isolates were both or either resistant to IMP and MRP. These 42 isolates were tested for MBL production by (a) IMP EDTA E test (17 MBL positive isolate detected), (b) IMP & IMP EDTA disc diffusion test (17 MBL positive isolate detected), (c) IMP & EDTA double disc synergy test (14 MBL positive isolate detected). Results: 48.84% isolates were resistant to Carbapenem and 19.76% isolates were found to be MBL producer. Colistin showed 100% susceptibility in all the MBL positive isolates. Conclusions: Among the 3 test done IMP & IMP EDTA test is easy to perform, cost effective and as sensitive as E test. Our results strongly suggest that for the MBL isolates should be detected on routine basis and the antibiotic prescribed accordingly.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL