Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Adv Rheumatol ; 64: 30, 2024. tab
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1556784

ABSTRACT

Abstract Background A cost of illness (COI) study aims to evaluate the socioeconomic burden that an illness imposes on society as a whole. This study aimed to describe the resources used, patterns of care, direct cost, and loss of productivity due to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in Brazil. Methods This 12-month, cross-sectional, COI study of patients with SLE (ACR 1997 Classification Criteria) collected data using patient interviews (questionnaires) and medical records, covering: SLE profile, resources used, morbidities, quality of life (12-Item Short Form Survey, SF-12), and loss of productivity. Patients were excluded if they were retired or on sick leave for another illness. Direct resources included health-related (consultations, tests, medications, hospitalization) or non-health-related (transportation, home adaptation, expenditure on caregivers) hospital resources. Costs were calculated using the unit value of each resource and the quantity consumed. A gamma regression model explored cost predictors for patients with SLE. Results Overall, 300 patients with SLE were included (92.3% female, mean [standard deviation (SD)] disease duration 11.8 [7.9] years), of which 100 patients (33.3%) were on SLE-related sick leave and 46 patients (15.3%) had stopped schooling. Mean (SD) travel time from home to a care facility was 4.4 (12.6) hours. Antimalarials were the most commonly used drugs (222 [74.0%]). A negative correlation was observed between SF-12 physical component and SLE Disease Activity Index (- 0.117, p = 0.042), Systemic Lupus International CollaboratingClinics/AmericanCollegeofRheumatology Damage Index (- 0.115, p = 0.046), medications/day for multiple co-morbidities (- 0.272, p < 0.001), SLE-specific drugs/day (- 0.113, p = 0.051), and lost productivity (- 0.570, p < 0.001). For the mental component, a negative correlation was observed with medications/day for multiple co-morbidities (- 0.272, p < 0.001), SLE-specific medications/day (- 0.113, p = 0.051), and missed appointments (- 0.232, p < 0.001). Mean total SLE cost was US$3,123.53/patient/year (median [interquartile range (IQR)] US$1,618.51 [$678.66, $4,601.29]). Main expenditure was medication, with a median (IQR) cost of US$910.62 ($460, $4,033.51). Mycophenolate increased costs by 3.664 times (p < 0.001), and inflammatory monitoring (erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein) reduced expenditure by 0.381 times (p < 0.001). Conclusion These results allowed access to care patterns, the median cost for patients with SLE in Brazil, and the differences across regions driven by biological, social, and behavioral factors. The cost of SLE provides an updated setting to support the decision-making process across the country.

2.
J. bras. econ. saúde (Impr.) ; 14(3)dezembro 2022.
Article in English | LILACS, ECOS | ID: biblio-1414882

ABSTRACT

Objective: To estimate direct medical costs of lupus nephritis (LN) in the Brazilian private healthcare system. Methods: An expert panel of five specialists were convened to discuss health resource usage in LN patient management. The discussion included diagnosis, treatment, and disease monitoring, including dialysis and kidney transplantation. Unit costs (in BRL) were obtained from public sources, and an estimation of 1-year costs was conducted. Results: Approximately 76.0% of patients with LN undergo kidney biopsy, of which 48.1% present with LN classes III­IV and 21.4% have class V. Around 67.5% of patients with LN classes III­IV experience an average of four renal flares annually. Overall, 20.3% of patients present refractory LN, and 10.3% have end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), requiring dialysis and kidney transplantation. Estimated total weighted annual costs per patient were BRL 115,824.81 for LN classes III­IV, BRL 85,684.79 for LN class V, BRL 115,594.98 for refractory LN; and BRL 325,712.88 for ESKD. The main annual cost driver for LN classes III­IV was renal flares (BRL 60,240.41; 52.0%) and dialysis for LN class V (BRL 31,128.38; 36.3%). Conclusions: Total direct costs increase when LN progresses to ESKD. Although it is challenging to improve the diagnosis, identification of the disease at an early stage, together with rapid initiation of treatment, are fundamental elements to optimize results, potentially reducing costs to the system and the impact of disease burden and quality of life on patients.


Objetivo: Estimar os custos médicos diretos da nefrite lúpica (NL) no sistema suplementar de saúde brasileiro. Métodos: Um painel de cinco especialistas foi estruturado para discutir o uso de recursos em saúde no manejo de pacientes com NL. Nesta discussão, incluíram-se o diagnóstico, o tratamento e o monitoramento da doença, contemplando também diálise e transplante renal. Os custos unitários foram obtidos de fontes públicas e os resultados expressos em custo anual. Resultados: Aproximadamente 76,0% dos pacientes com NL são submetidos à biópsia renal, sendo 48,1% com NL de classes III-IV e 21,4% de classe V. Cerca de 67,5% dos pacientes com classes III-IV apresentam, aproximadamente, quatro flares renais anuais. No geral, 20,3% dos pacientes apresentam NL refratária e 10,3% desenvolvem doença renal terminal (DRT), necessitando de diálise e transplante renal. O custo ponderado anual estimado por paciente foi de R$ 115.824,81 para NL de classes III-IV, R$ 85.684,79 para classe V, R$ 115.594,98 para NL refratária e R$ 325.712,88 para DRT. O principal fator para incremento dos custos anuais para NL de classes III-IV foram os flares renais (R$ 60.240,41; 52,0%) e, na classe V, a diálise (R$ 31.128,38; 36,3%). Conclusões: Há um incremento dos custos diretos da NL na progressão para DRT. Embora seja desafiador melhorar o diagnóstico, a identificação da doença em uma fase precoce, aliada ao tratamento iniciado de forma célere, são elementos fundamentais para otimizar os resultados, potencialmente reduzindo os custos ao sistema e o impacto da carga da doença e qualidade de vida dos pacientes.


Subject(s)
Lupus Nephritis , Immunosuppression Therapy , Kidney Transplantation , Costs and Cost Analysis , Dialysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL