Endovascular treatment for closed articular artery injuries / 中华普通外科杂志

Objective To explore the efficacy of endovascular treatment for closed articular artery injuries.Methods The clinical data of 13 patients from Jan 2010 to Dec 2014 treated for closed articular artery injuries were analyzed retrospectively.The location,severity and extent of arterial injury were confirmed by intraoperative arteriography.The diameter and length of the injured arteries were measured.The guidewire was sent to the lesion site and working wire pathway was established.When the guidewire was difficult to pass through the lesion site,femoral and posterior tibial or radial artery may be used to establish working wire pathway.The stent or stent-graft was implanted through the contralateral femoral artery or distal end of ipsilateral artery.Results Intraoperative angiography confirmed intimal injury (n =2),partial transection (n =5),complete transection (n =5) and arteriovenous fistula (n =1).Eighteen stents or stent-grafts were implanted.Treatment was successful in all patients without peiropeartive death and procedure-related complications.All were followed up for 15 to 48 months and the mean follow-up was (30 ± 11) months.Three patients with stent lumen stenosis less than 50％ as showed by angiography.There was no stent fracture,displacement,or deformation.Conclusions Endovascular treatment for closed articular artery injuries is of less invasion,shorter operative time and quick postoperative recovery.

Endovascular Repair of Blunt Popliteal Arterial Injuries

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of endovascular repair for blunt popliteal arterial injuries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of seven patients with clinical suspicion of popliteal arterial injuries that were confirmed by arteriography was performed from September 2009 to July 2014. Clinical data included demographics, mechanism of injury, type of injury, location of injury, concomitant injuries, time of endovascular procedures, time interval from trauma to blood flow restoration, instrument utilized, and follow-up. All patients were male (mean age of 35.9 ± 10.3 years). The type of lesion involved intimal injury (n = 1), partial transection (n = 2), complete transection (n = 2), arteriovenous fistula (n = 1), and pseudoaneurysm (n = 1). All patients underwent endovascular repair of blunt popliteal arterial injuries. RESULTS: Technical success rate was 100%. Intimal injury was treated with a bare-metal stent. Pseudoaneurysm and popliteal artery transections were treated with bare-metal stents. Arteriovenous fistula was treated with bare-metal stent and coils. No perioperative death and procedure-related complication occurred. The average follow-up was 20.9 ± 2.3 months (range 18-24 months). One patient underwent intra-arterial thrombolysis due to stent thrombosis at 18 months after the procedure. All limbs were salvaged. Stent migration, deformation, or fracture was not found during the follow-up. CONCLUSION: Endovascular repair seems to be a viable approach for patients with blunt popliteal arterial injuries, especially on an emergency basis. Endovascular repair may be effective in the short-term. Further studies are required to evaluate the long-term efficacy of endovascular repair.

Erratum: Endovascular Repair of Blunt Popliteal Arterial Injuries

The publisher and authors would like to draw the reader's attention to an error in the following article. Endovascular Repair of Blunt Popliteal Arterial Injuries. Korean J Radiol 2016;17(5):789-796.