ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of eugenolcontaining endodontic sealers and luting strategy on the pull-out bond strength of glass fiber posts to dentin. Sixty-four bovine incisors were randomly assigned into two groups of 32 specimens each for obturation procedure with gutta-percha only, or with Pulp Canal Sealer EWT. Subsequently, the roots were prepared for the fiber post Reforpost and all specimens of each endodontic sealing procedure were allocated to four groups (n=8), according to the strategies for post cementation: A) Single Bond 2 and RelyX ARC; B) All Bond 2 and C&B cement; C) All Bond 2 and RelyX ARC; D) Single Bond 2 and C&B Cement. The posts were cemented immediately after the endodontic treatment. The pull-out test was performed at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min in a universal testing machine (EMIC). Data (Kgf) were submitted to a two-way ANOVA and Tukey test (p ≤ 0.05). The eugenol-based sealer did not influence the pull-out bond strength of fiber posts regardless of the luting strategy. RelyX ARC showed higher bond strength than C&B Cement when used with Single Bond 2 adhesive system, when the eugenol-based sealer was present. All Bond 2, when associated to all cements studied, promoted similar bond strength, regardless of the eugenol-containing endodontic sealer. In conclusion, eugenolcontaining sealer did not influence the pull-out bond strength values of the resin luting systems for glass fiber post cementation. The bond system and resin cement association from the same manufacturer had similar bond strength values for dentin.
O objetivo desse estudo foi avaliar a influencia de cimentos endodonticos a base de eugenol e estrategia de cimentacao resinosa na resistencia a tracao de pinos de fibra de vidro a dentina. Sessenta e quatro incisivos bovinos foram aleatoriamente divididos em dois grupos com 32 especimes para cada procedimento de obturacao, com o cimento a base de eugenol Pulp Canal Sealer EWT ou somente com guta percha pela tecnica termoplastificada. Apos, realizou-se o prepare do conduto radicular para o pino de fibra Reforpost e posteriormente, as amostras de cada procedimento obturador foram separadas em quarto grupos (n=8), considerando as estrategias para cimentacao do pino: A) Adper Single Bond 2 e RelyX ARC; B) All Bond 2 e C&B cement; C) All Bond 2 e RelyX ARC; D) Adper Single Bond 2 e C&B Cement. Os pinos foram imediatamente cimentados apos o tratamento endodontico. Dessa maneira, o teste de pull-out foi realizado a uma velocidade de 0.5 mm/min em maquina de ensaio universal (EMIC DL2000). Os dados (Kgf) A analise estatistica foi realizada pelos testes ANOVA de dois fatores e teste de Tukey (p ≤ 0.05). O cimento endodontico contend eugenol nao influenciou a resistencia de uniao a tracao (pull-out) dos pinos de fibra, independente da estrategia de cimentacao. O RelyX ARC ofereceu maior resistencia de uniao do pino a dentina, comparado ao C&B Cement quanto utilizado com o Adper Single Bond 2, na presenca do cimento endodontico contendo eugenol. O All Bond 2 quando associado a todos os cimentos estudados promoveram uma resistencia de uniao semelhante, independente do conteudo de eugenol na cimentacao endodontica. Em conclusao, o cimento endodontico a base de eugenol nao influenciou na resistencia a tracao de pinos de fibra a dentina. A associacao de sistema adesivo e cimento resinoso do mesmo fabricante apresentou valores de resistencia de uniao semelhantes na cimentacao de pinos de fibra.