Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Tropical Biomedicine ; : 11-16, 2022.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-936392

ABSTRACT

@#Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole is an active agent against Burkholderia pseudomallei and is being used in intensive and maintenance phases of melioidosis therapy. In this study, we evaluated the bactericidal activities of β-lactams (imipenem, ceftazidime and amoxicillinclavulanate) alone and in combinations with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole against B. pseudomallei. Four clinical strains of B. pseudomallei were selected based on different genotypes that are frequently found in Malaysia. The minimum inhibitory concentrations of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ceftazidime, imipenem and amoxicillin-clavulanate were determined using microdilution broth method. The bactericidal activities and synergy effects of β-lactams and/or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole were evaluated by checkerboard and static time-kill analyses at 1×MIC concentration of each antibiotic. Using checkerboard method, the β-lactam/trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole combinations exhibited ΣFIC of 0.75-4.00. In time-kill analysis, ceftazidime/trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole combination demonstrated synergy against three strains (less 2.25-2.41 log10CFU/mL compared to the most active antibiotic monotherapy) whereas imipenem/trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole combination regimen showed synergy against one strain (less 3.32 log10CFU/mL). No antagonist effect or major re-growth was observed in all combination regimens, whereas 11 out of 12 of β-lactam monotherapy regimens were associated with re-growth of bacteria. However, all β-lactam monotherapy regimens exhibited rapid and stronger killing activities against BUPS/07/14, in the initial 12 hours compared to β-lactam/ trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole combination regimens. The combination of β-lactams with trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole demonstrated better killing effect at 24 hours compared to monotherapy and no major bacterial regrowth was observed. Nevertheless, delay in killing activities of β-lactam/trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole combination regimens against BUPS/07/14 need further examination because this phenomenon can lead to treatment failure in some patients.

2.
Tropical Biomedicine ; : 783-790, 2020.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-825632

ABSTRACT

@#Reduced susceptibility in Burkholderia pseudomallei during carbapenem therapy may lead to treatment failure. We isolated a clinical strain that had developed reduced susceptibility to carbapenems while on treatment. After reviewing the patient’s clinical notes, the initial isolate (BUPS01/14) was exposed to carbapenem in vitro to mimic the clinical scenario. The stability of susceptibility of the carbapenem-exposed strain (BUPS01/14R) was examined by serial subculture in antibiotic-free broth. Biochemical and morphological comparison was performed by the VITEK® system and electron microscopy. MICs increased 32-fold following carbapenem exposure and became stable in the antibiotic-free environment. On electron microscopic examination, the BUPS01/14R cells were smoother and less wrinkled compared to BUPS01/14 cells. This report highlights a potential anti-melioidosis treatment failure due to the emergence of resistance while on carbapenem monotherapy. Further study of this strain is necessary to understand the mechanism of resistance at a molecular level.

3.
Tropical Biomedicine ; : 599-605, 2011.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-630100

ABSTRACT

An understanding of common pathogens and their antibiotic sensitivity patterns is critical for proper management of sepsis in Emergency Department (ED). The goal of the study was to identify common organisms isolated from blood cultures of patients attended to ED and their antimicrobial susceptibility. Beginning from 2002, all cases of positive blood culture collected by the ED, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia (HUSM) were recorded and analysed. Over the period of eight years, we documented 995 cases of positive blood cultures. Of these samples, 549 (55.2%) were Gram-negative bacteria; 419 (42.1%) were Gram-positive bacteria; 10 (1.0%) were anaerobic organisms; 10 (1.0%) were fungus; and 7 (0.7%) cases were mixed organisms. Gram-negative bacteria were observed to develop more resistance to antimicrobial agents, especially those commonly used in an outpatient setting with less than 80% sensitivity to ampicillin, cotrimoxazole and ciprofloxacin. By contrast, there has been no marked change in the sensitivity trends of Gram-positive bacteria over the same period. In conclusion, ED physicians are more equipped to initiate empirical antimicrobial therapy especially when dealing with possibility of Gram-negative sepsis.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL