Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add filters








Type of study
Language
Year range
1.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-226694

ABSTRACT

Background: Post operative pain is difficult to assessment and its management has been neglected at times. Moreover, the drug treatment involves administration of drug on as and when basis which leads to inadequate control. Methods: This observational, prospective study was conducted in 100 post-operative patients i.e., 50 each from surgery and orthopedics departments. Investigator enrolled post-operative patients within 24 hours of surgery and followed them for next 5 days or till hospital discharge, whichever was earlier. Analgesic prescribing pattern, self-assessment of pain, patient and doctor satisfaction using ASSIST questionnaire were recorded in Case Record Form and analysed. Results: Out of 100 patients, average number of analgesics prescribed post-operatively was 1.49±0.5 (baseline and all follow-up). 76.5% patients received NSAIDs which included diclofenac (44.29%) and paracetamol (30.87%). Opioids in the form of tramadol were prescribed in 23.49% patients. Mean least pain experienced by patients on day 1 was 2±0.75 which decreased to 1.32±0.63 on day 5. Mean worst pain decreased from 6.64±1.43 on day 1 to 3.38±1.17 on day 5. Average percentage of duration of severe pain was 35.2%±16.48 on day 1 which successively decreased to 16.32±8.26 on day 5. Average pain relief observed in 62.3% patients on day one increased to 80.88% on day 5. Patient satisfaction increased as pain score decreased (r=-0.73) and a strong positive correlation was observed between doctor satisfaction and patient satisfaction (r=0.91). Conclusions: Inadequate control of post-operative pain affects effective patient management and recovery. Incorporation of effective pain assessment scores in pain management is desirable.

3.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-150977

ABSTRACT

Malaria is a major health concern in the developing world including India. Overdiagnosis and overprescribing of malaria may lead to increase morbidity, mortality and increases risk of resistance to antimalarial drugs and hence increase the economical burden to health care system. The present study was carried out to determine the actual cases of malaria and extent of chloroquine resistance at Civil Hospital Ahmedabad, a tertiary care teaching hospital in Gujarat, India. After Institutional Ethics Committee approval, adult patients of either gender, presenting with a history of fever at the Out Patient Department (OPD), diagnosed to be suffering from malaria and prescribed chloroquine were included in the study. Peripheral thick blood smear test and OptiMAL-rapid diagnostic test (RDT) were carried out. RDT was performed in these patients on day 0 before the start of chloroquine treatment and after completion of the 3 day chloroquine treatment. They were again subjected to RDT on day 4. The positive cases on RDTon day 4 were considered as resistant to chloroquine. During the study period of 12 months, out of the 250 clinically suspected cases of malaria who were prescribed chloroquine, 80 (31%) cases (35 cases of P. vivax and the 45 of P. falciparum ) were positive for malaria (by the peripheral smear and the Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) OptiMAL test). Thirty out of the 35 cases of P. vivax malaria, responded to the three- day chloroquine treatment. Out of the 45 cases of P. falciparum malaria, 30 responded to chloroquine while 15 patients (35%) continued to be OptiMAL positive on 4th day and required change of treatment. It suggests that an early diagnosis, definitive treatment and avoiding overprescribing could delay drug resistance and reduce the morbidity and mortality due the disease.

4.
Indian J Exp Biol ; 1994 May; 32(5): 314-7
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-56139

ABSTRACT

Spontaneous motor activity, rotarod test and observational rating of sedation were employed to study effect of nifedipine on sedation produced by reserpine, clonidine and propranolol. Reserpine (2 mg kg-1), clonidine (4 mg kg-1), and propranolol (40 mg kg-1) significantly reduced spontaneous motor activity and staying capacity of animals on accelerating rotarod (P < 0.01). Observational sedation was also caused significantly as indicated by a higher score in test. Nifedipine (2 mg kg-1) produced no sedation or excitation on its own. Reduction in spontaneous motor activity produced by reserpine and clonidine was partially reversed in animals treated with nifedipine (P < 0.01). A similar effect of nifedipine was also evident on the observational sedation induced by reserpine and clonidine. Effect of these drugs on rotarod times was nearly totally antagonised by nifedipine. Nifedipine did not oppose the sedation produced by propranolol which actually became significantly greater in the animals pretreated with nifedipine in all three tests. It is concluded that nifedipine antagonizes the sedation produced by reserpine and clonidine, probably by blocking central alpha 2-adrenoceptors. The sedative effect of propranolol can be potentiated by nifedipine possibly because of a pharmacokinetic interaction.


Subject(s)
Animals , Clonidine/antagonists & inhibitors , Drug Interactions , Female , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Male , Mice , Nifedipine/pharmacology , Propranolol/pharmacology , Reserpine/antagonists & inhibitors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL