Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-214902

ABSTRACT

Cervical spine motion restriction is an integral component of protocol for management of trauma victims. The use of rigid cervical collar for the same, presents a hurdle in airway management in patients where intubation is mandated for successful resuscitation. Hence, techniques alternative to conventional laryngoscopy need to be explored through simulation studies, to ease the process of intubation and benefit the actual trauma victims. We wanted to assess the performance of McCoy laryngoscope and LMA CTrach assembly and compare the intubation characteristics in patients with cervical collar.METHODS80 patients of ASA status I or II, scheduled for elective surgery requiring general anaesthesia and endotracheal intubation were randomly allocated to two groups- A and B. Patients in Group A were intubated using McCoy laryngoscope and Group B using LMA CTrach, with cervical collar in situ. Airway assessment included measuring thyromental distance, observing MPC grade and measuring inter-incisor distance, before and after application of semirigid cervical collar. Glottic view was noted using modified Cormack-Lehane grading. Device insertion time, total intubation time, number of attempts, haemodynamic factors and airway complications during the procedure were noted.RESULTSThere was decrease in inter-incisor distance and worsening of MPC grade in both groups post application of cervical collar. The time taken for device insertion in Group A was 16.95 + 3 sec, and in Group B was 33 + 4 sec (P= 0.0001). The total intubation time in Group A was 40.4 + 6 sec and in Group B was 57.4 + 4.37 sec (P= 0.0001). CL grade I was more common in Group B (31) than Group A (17) (P= 0.003). The number of attempts required, mean haemodynamic parameters and airway complication were comparable between the two groups.CONCLUSIONSThe McCoy laryngoscope requires less time to obtain glottic view and subsequent intubation, but LMA CTrach provides better glottic exposure. Thus, LMA CTrach has better performance characteristics in patients with cervical collar in situ.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL