Implementation of an Acute Coronary Syndrome Simulation Training Strategy for Emergency Healthcare Professionals

The knowledge on the management of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is essential to reduce the gap between evidence and practice. Objective: To describe a simulation training strategy for emergency healthcare professionals and provide preliminary data on knowledge acquisition, learners' confidence and prescription of medications after training. Methods: The training was part of the implementation of two myocardial infarction systems of care. It comprehended lectures and simulation-based learning using high and low-fidelity mannequins and actors. It was tested in two phases: the first one in Belo Horizonte and the second one in Montes Claros, both in the state of Minas Gerais. A test was applied before and after training to assess knowledge acquisition. Confidence to perform thrombolysis in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients was assessed using a questionnaire, and the impact on medication prescription analyzed STEMI patients admitted to hospitals in Montes Claros. Results: In the first phase, 156 professionals answered both tests: 70% of them improved their results and the median number of right answers increased (6, interquartile range [IQR] 5-7; vs 7 ([IQR] 6-9; p < 0.05). In the second phase, 242 professionals answered both tests: 58% of the physicians and 83% of the nurses obtained better test scores. Participants referred a positive impact on their clinical practice, 95% reported feeling very secure when perform fibrinolysis after the training, and there was also an impact on medication prescription. Conclusions: There was an impact on the learners' knowledge acquisition and confidence using our two-phase training model, with evidence of impact on performance

Satisfaction of Emergency Physicians with the Care Provided to Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases in the Northern Region of Minas Gerais / Satisfação de Médicos dos Serviços de Urgência com o Cuidado às Doenças Cardiovasculares na Região Ampliada Norte de Minas Gerais

Abstract Background: The dissatisfaction of health professionals in emergency services has a negative influence on both the quality of care provided for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients and the retention of those professionals. Objective: To assess physicians' satisfaction with the structure of care and diagnosis at the emergency services in the Northern Region of Minas Gerais before the implementation of the AMI system of care. Methods: This cross-sectional study included physicians from the emergency units of the ambulance service (SAMU) and level II, III and IV regional hospitals. Satisfaction was assessed by using the CARDIOSATIS-Team scale. The median score for each item, the overall scale and the domains were calculated and then compared by groups using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test. Correlation between time since graduation and satisfaction level was assessed using Spearman correlation. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Of the 137 physicians included in the study, 46% worked at SAMU. Most of the interviewees showed overall dissatisfaction with the structure of care, and the median score for the overall scale was 2.0 [interquartile range (IQR) 2.0-4.0]. Most SAMU physicians expressed their dissatisfaction with the care provided (54%), the structure for managing cardiovascular diseases (52%), and the technology available for diagnosis (54%). The evaluation of the overall satisfaction evidenced that the dissatisfaction of SAMU physicians was lower when compared to that of hospital emergency physicians. Level III/IV hospital physicians expressed greater overall satisfaction when compared to level II hospital physicians. Conclusion: This study showed the overall dissatisfaction of the emergency physicians in the region assessed with the structure of care for cardiovascular emergencies.

Resumo Fundamentos: A insatisfação dos profissionais de saúde dos serviços de urgência tem influência negativa na qualidade do cuidado ao infarto agudo do miocárdio (IAM) e na fixação desses profissionais. Objetivo: Avaliar a satisfação de médicos com a estrutura de atendimento e diagnóstico de serviços públicos de urgência na Região Ampliada Norte de Minas Gerais, previamente à implantação da linha de cuidado ao IAM. Métodos: Estudo transversal, que incluiu médicos das unidades de emergência do SAMU e de hospitais regionais nível II, III e IV. Foi avaliada a satisfação usando a escala CARDIOSATIS-Team. O escore mediano para cada item, a escala global e os domínios foram calculados e então comparados por grupos, utilizando o teste não paramétrico de Mann-Whitney. Foi avaliada a correlação entre tempo de formação e nível de satisfação com o método de Spearman. Um valor-p < 0,05 foi considerado significativo. Resultados: De 137 médicos incluídos, 46% trabalhavam no SAMU. A maior parte dos entrevistados demonstrou insatisfação geral com a estrutura de atendimento, cuja mediana da escala global foi 2,0 (intervalo interquartil [IQ] 2,0-4,0). A maioria dos médicos do SAMU demonstrou-se insatisfeita quanto a atendimento prestado (54%), estrutura para condução das doenças cardiovasculares (52%) e tecnologia disponível para diagnóstico (54%). Na avaliação da satisfação global, evidenciou-se que a insatisfação dos médicos do SAMU foi menor quando comparada à dos médicos de urgência hospitalar. Os médicos de hospitais nível III/IV demonstraram maior satisfação global quando comparados aos de hospitais nível II. Conclusão: Este estudo demonstrou insatisfação geral dos médicos dos serviços de urgência na região em relação à estrutura de atendimento às emergências cardiovasculares.