ABSTRACT
Abstract Antimicrobial resistance is a global public health problem. Root canal microbiota associated with apical periodontitis represents a well-known reservoir of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs). However, the effect of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in this reservoir is unknown. This study aimed to establish if root canal microbiota associated with apical periodontitis in T2DM patients is an augmented reservoir by identifying the prevalence of nine common ARGs and comparing it with the prevalence in nondiabetic patients. Methodology This cross-sectional study included two groups: A T2DM group conformed of 20 patients with at least ten years of living with T2DM and a control group of 30 nondiabetic participants. Premolar or molar teeth with pulp necrosis and apical periodontitis were included. A sample was collected from each root canal before endodontic treatment. DNA was extracted, and ARGs were identified by polymerase chain reaction. Results tetW and tetM genes were the most frequent (93.3 and 91.6%, respectively), while ermA was the least frequent (8.3%) in the total population. The distribution of the ARGs was similar in both groups, but a significant difference (p<0.005) was present in ermB, ermC, cfxA, and tetQ genes, being more frequent in the T2DM group. A total of eighty percent of the T2DM patients presented a minimum of four ARGs, while 76.6% of the control group presented a maximum of three. Conclusions Root canal microbiota associated with apical periodontitis in T2DM patients carries more ARGs. Therefore, this pathological niche could be considered an augmented reservoir.
ABSTRACT
There is no information about the possible impact in denture retention after the use of common denture adhesives (DAs) when poor denture foundations (PDF) are present. Moreover, there is a lack of information about which current formulation provides greater retention and for how long. Twelve models from edentulous patients with different ridge shape and border height were used and complete dentures were manufactured. Four different formulation brands of DAs were tested after 10 minutes and three, six, nine, and 12 hours of DA application using a universal testing machine. The Fittydent® and Fixodent® adhesives had the highest retention at 12 hours. The PDF group increased on average its retention by 400 %. However, the group presented lower retention compared to the good denture foundation group. In conclusion, DAs significantly increased denture retention. The PDF group were the most benefited with the application of DAs. The Fixodent® paste had the highest retention.
No existe información acerca del posible impacto en la retención de dentaduras después del uso de adhesivos dentales comunes (DAs) cuando existen rebordes alveolares deficientes (PDF). Más aun, existe una falta de información acerca de cuál formula actual provee mayor retención y por cuanto tiempo. Doce modelos de pacientes edentulos con diferentes formas y alturas en sus rebordes alveolares fueron usados, y dentaduras completas les fueron realizadas. Cuatro diferentes fórmulas y marcas de DAs fueron evaluadas después de 10 minutos, tres, seis, nueve y 12 horas de que se aplicó el DA usando una maquina universal de pruebas. Los adhesivos Fittydent® y Fixodent® presentaron la retención más alta a las 12 horas. El grupo con PDF incrementó su retención hasta en un 400 %. Sin embargo, el grupo presentó menor retención cuando se comparó con el grupo que posee adecuados procesos alveolares. Los DAs incrementaron significativamente la retención de las dentaduras. El grupo PDF fue el más beneficiado con la aplicación de DAs. La pasta Fixodent® provee la más alta retención.