Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
The Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association ; : 52-58, 1981.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-767704

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study is to assess the differences of the lumbosacral angles between the lying and standing position among Iumbago patients. Among Iumbago patients the following diseases with known causes were exclused in this study; spondylolisthesis, spondylolysis, pure herniated nucleus pulposus, tuberculous spondylitis, congenltal anomalies, trauma and psychosis etc. Only the following with unknown causes were included; idlopatic lumbago, hernlated nucleus pulposus with bone and joint changes, instability and degenerative osteoarthritis. The following lumbosacral angles were measured and evaluated in 460 lumbago patients; 271 patients in the lying position and 189 patients in the standing position. 1. Ferguson angle 2. Sacrovertebral angle (Mitchell angle) 3. LS horlzontal angle 4. Promonotorium angle 5. Line of weight bearing The results were summarized as follows; 1. Ferguson angle Lying position 38.4 Standing positon 35.3 Sacrovertebral angle 140.7 142 L5 horizontal angle 20.4 17.4 Promontorlum angle 134.4 134.9 2. Ferguson and L5 horizontal angles in lumbago patients were increased in the lying position and decreased in the standing position as compared with the angles in normal individuals (control group). 3. Sacrovertebral angle In lumbago patients was decreased in the lying position. 4. Promonotorium angle in lumbago patients was increased in the lying and standing position. 5. Judging by the Iine of weight bearing, Iumbago patients in the:lying position showed more instability as compared with that in the standing position group.


Subject(s)
Humans , Deception , Joints , Low Back Pain , Osteoarthritis , Posture , Psychotic Disorders , Spondylitis , Spondylolisthesis , Spondylolysis , Statistics as Topic , Weight-Bearing
2.
The Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association ; : 599-603, 1980.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-767621

ABSTRACT

Absence of the thumb, either traumatic or congenical, causes a severe deficiency in hand function; in fact grasp and pinch are almost impossible. Thus when the thumb is partially or totally absent, reconstructive surgery is appealing. Usually the thumb should be reconstructed only when amputation has been at the metacarpophal-angeal joint or at a more proximal level. The procedures for reconstruction of the thumb are well known. They include transposition of a digit, procedures to lengthen the thumb metacarpal and methods of total reconstruction including a pedicle graft to obtain sensibility. Although pollicization (transposition of a finger to replace an absent thumb) endangers the finger, that is worthwhile, especially in complete bilateral absence of the thumb or in bilateral traumatic amputation. The each finger with a part or the whole of the metacarpal, has been transplanted to the stump of the metacarpal of the thumb or the trapezium. When all of the fingers are normal, the index finger is the best choice for thumb replacement because of its circumferential size, phalangeal length, independent motion and proximity to the thenar eminence. Recently this operation has been done with conservation of all nerves, vessels, tendons and muscles. We have had two pollicization operations (transposition of index finger) in the patient of bilateral traumatic amputation of the thumbs. Four months later excellent pinch and grasp with normal sensibility in the reconstructed thumbs were obtained with all remaining digits.


Subject(s)
Humans , Amputation, Surgical , Amputation, Traumatic , Fingers , Hand , Hand Strength , Joints , Muscles , Tendons , Thumb , Transplants
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL