ABSTRACT
Objective:To analyze the prognosis and influencing factors of patients with brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with different doses of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT).Methods:A total of 244 NSCLC patients with brain metastases who underwent WBRT in the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from 2013 to 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. According to different doses of WBRT (EQD 2Gy), they were divided into the 30-39 Gy group ( n= 104) and ≥40 Gy group ( n= 140). The intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared betweentwo groups. According to the number of brain metastases, GPA score, KPS score, chemotherapy and targeted therapy, the prognosis of different doses of WBRT was further analyzed. Results:The median iPFS and OS of all patients were 6.9 months and 11.8 months, respectively. Univariate survival analysis: the 1-year iPFS and 1-year OS between two groups were 22.5% and 25.4%( P=0.430) and 41.1% and 46.4%( P=0.068), respectively. Multivariate survival analysis: different doses of WBRT were not associated with the improvement of iPFS and OS; independent factors influencing iPFS included local boost, gender, number of brain metastases, chemotherapy and targeted therapy; independent factors influencing OS included gender, number of brain metastases, chemotherapy and targeted therapy. Subgroup analysis: in patients with KPS≥90, the 1-year iPFS and OS of patients with WBRT ≥ 40 Gy were seemingly better than those of their counterparts with 30-39 Gy, but the difference was statistically significant only in OS ( P=0.047), the difference was not statistically significant in iPFS ( P=0.068); in patients with chemotherapy, the 1-year iPFS and OS of patients with WBRT≥40 Gy were better than those of their counterparts with 30-39 Gy ( P=0.017, P=0.012); in patients with targeted therapy, the 1-year iPFS and OS in the WBRT≥40 Gy group were better than those in the 30-39 Gy group ( P=0.012, P=0.045). Conclusions:The 30-39 Gy may be the appropriate dose of WBRT for NSCLC patients with brain metastases. WBRT≥40 Gy does not bring more benefits. WBRT≥40 Gy may benefit NSCLC patients with brain metastases with high KPS score or active systemic therapy.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To analyze the prognosis and influencing factors of different radiotherapy modes in patients with brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and to explore the best benefit population with radiotherapy boost under different prognostic scores.Methods:634 patients with brain metastasis from NSCLC admitted to the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from 2013 to 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. According to different radiotherapy modes, they were divided into three groups: no radiotherapy group ( n=330), whole-brain radiotherapy group (WBRT)( n=127) and whole-brain radiotherapy combined with boost group (WBRT+ boost)( n=177). The intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. The multivariate prognostic factors were analyzed by the Cox models. Results:The median iPFS and OS of all patients were 6.9 months and 9.0 months, respectively. In the no radiotherapy, WBRT and WBRT+ boost groups, the 1-year iPFS was 15.1%, 16.3% and 40.2%( P=0.002), and the 1-year OS was 33.7%, 38.2% and 48.1%( P<0.001), respectively. Multivariate survival analysis demonstrated that different radiotherapy modes were the independent factors affecting iPFS and OS. Subgroup analysis revealed that for patients with 1-3 brain metastases, the 1-year OS and iPFS in the WBRT+ boost group were better than those of WBRT alone ( P=0.026, P=0.044) when GPA score was 2.5-4.0; the 1-year OS and iPFSin the WBRT+ boost group were better than those of WBRT alone ( P=0.036, P=0.049) when there was no targeted therapy; for patients with ≥4 brain metastases, the 1-year iPFS in the WBRT+ boost group was better than that of WBRT alone ( P=0.019, P=0.012) when GPA score was 2.5-4.0 and there was no targeted therapy. When the GPA score was 0-2 or there was targeted therapy, the 1-year OS and iPFS in the WBRT+ boost group were better than those of WBRT alone, but the difference was not statistically significant (all P>0.05). Conclusions:Radiotherapy can significantly improve the iPFS and OS of NSCLC patients with brain metastases. When the number of brain metastases is 1-3, GPA score is 2.5-4.0 or no targeted therapy, boost may improve the iPFS and OS; when the number of brain metastases is more than 4, GPA score is 2.5-4.0 or no targeted therapy, boost may only bring iPFS benefit; when GPA score is 0-2 or targeted therapy, boost may not benefit significantly.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To explore the optimal local treatment pattern of supraclavicular lymph node in breast cancer patients with synchronous ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastasis (sISLM).Methods:Clinical data of 128 breast cancer patients with sISLM admitted to the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from 2010 to 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 68 cases were treated with supraclavicular lymph node dissection combined with radiotherapy, and 60 cases received radiotherapy alone. The locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were statistically compared between two groups.Results:Univariate analysis demonstrated that the 5-year LRFS, DMFS, PFS and OS did not significantly differ between two groups (all P>0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that the local treatment pattern of supraclavicular lymph node was an independent prognostic factor for the 5-year DMFS, PFS and OS (all P<0.05). Subgroup analysis showed that when radiotherapy alone was performed, the 5-year OS of patients in the supraclavicular region radiation dose of>50 Gy group were significantly better than that in the 50 Gy group ( P=0.047). When supraclavicular lymph node dissection combined with radiotherapy was delivered, if the number of dissection was less than 10, the 5-year LRFS, DMFS, PFS, OS of patients in the>50 Gy group were all better than those in the 50 Gy group numerically without statistical significance (all P>0.05). If the number of dissection was ≥10, the 5-year LRFS, DMFS, PFS, OS in the 50 Gy group were better than those in the>50 Gy group numerically, whereas significant difference was only found in the 5-year DMFS ( P=0.028). Conclusions:Supraclavicular lymph node dissection combined with radiotherapy may be the optimal local treatment pattern for supraclavicular lymph node. When radiotherapy alone is performed, a radiation boost to the supraclavicular region may improve OS. When supraclavicular lymph node dissection combined with radiotherapy is performed, if the degree of dissection is low, a radiation boost to the supraclavicular region may bring clinical benefits. However, if the degree of dissection is high, a radiation boost to the supraclavicular region may not bring significant clinical benefits.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To evaluate the effect of prophylactic irradiation of internal mammary lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer in this Meta-analysis.Methods:CNKI, Wanfang Medical network, CBM, PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched by computer. The controlled clinical studies comparing whether or not internal mammary lymph node irradiation as an intervention were included and the quality of the included literature was evaluated according to Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). RevMan 5.3 software and Stata 14 software were used for Meta-analysis.Results:A total of 11 original articles were included, and 13 181 patients were included for Meta-analysis. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall survival (OS) between patients with and without internal mammary lymph node irradiation ( P=0.490). The subgroup analysis using the date of treatment and the degree of risk in the enrolled population as criteria showed that 5-year OS was significantly increased after internal mammary area irradiation in high-risk stage Ⅱ-Ⅲ patients (N+ , T 3-T 4 stage) with the date of treatment of after 2000( P=0.003, 0.006). Compared with patients without internal mammary area irradiation, internal mammary irradiation significantly increased the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS)( P<0.001). Conclusion:Under the modern radiotherapy technology, internal mammary lymph node irradiation improves the DFS of patients, and may bring OS benefits to high-risk stage Ⅱ-Ⅲ breast cancer patients (N+ , T 3-T 4 stage).
ABSTRACT
Objective: To compare overall survival (OS) and intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) effects of whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in NSCLC patients with brain metastases (BM) stratified by EGFR mutation status (mutant, wild-type). Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 215 NSCLC BM patients diagnosed in January 2013 to January 2015 with known EGFR status and followed up to December 1, 2016. Stratified Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox models were used to evaluate the effects of WBRT (defined as≥30 Gy, "W") and TKIs (after BM, "T") on OS and iPFS independently and jointly. Two-sided P>0.20 was considered non-significant (ns). Results: In patients with BM, the mean age was 58 years, 52% were female, and 93% had adenocarcinoma. Those with EGFR mutations (114 patients) had "W" (35 patients) and "T" (87 patients) with adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) (P) of 1.135 (ns) and 0.202 (P<0.001) for OS, respectively, and 1.122 (ns) and 0.275 (P<0.001) for iPFS, respectively. "W+T" (22 patients), "T only" (65 patients), "W only"(13 patients), and "neither" (14 patients) had OS-median survival time (MST) of 14.1, 15.3, 7.1, and 4.3 months, respectively; their iPFS-MST were 14.1, 13.4, 6.8, and 4.5 months, respectively. Their adjusted HRs (P) were 0.196 (P=0.003), 0.114 (P<0.001), 0.434 (ns), 1.000 (ref) for OS, respectively, and 0.272 (P=0.012), 0.200 (P<0.001), 0.622 (ns), 1.000 (ref) for iPFS, respectively. Compared with "T only," "W+T" was not associated with better survival and "W only" had adjusted HRs (P) of 3.804 (P=0.025) for OS and 3.114 (P=0.032) for iPFS. The EGFR wild-type (101 patients) used "W" in 43 patients with OS-MST of 11.3 (7.1) and iPFS of 11.2 (4.8) months; the adjusted HRs (P) of "W"were 0.539 (P=0.105) for OS and 0.485 (P=0.048) for iPFS. Conclusions: In EGFR-mutant NSCLC BM patients, TKIs are associated with improved survival, whether, WBRT alone or combined are not. In cases of EGFR wild-type, WBRT confers the improved the iPFS.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the effect of radiation boost ( Boost ) on further improving overall survival ( OS) and intracranial progression-free survival ( IPFS) of small-cell lung cancer ( SCLC) brain metastases (BM) patients treated by whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Methods A retrospective analysis of 142 consecutive SCLC BM patients admitted between 2013 and 2015 was conducted after excluding those with historical prophylactic cranial irradiation (n=16) or SRT (n=10) or local RT alone (n=1).The Kaplan-Meier curve was utilized to calculate the survival rate. The log-rank test and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression model were utilized to evaluate clinical prognosis. Results All patients were aged 59. 6 years old on average, and the female proportion was 23％. The quantity of brain metastasis lesion was 1 in 35％, 2-3 in 23％ and ≥4 in 42％, respectively. The proportion of patients receiving chemotherapy was 70％. The median OS was 9. 0 months and the median IPFS was 7. 3 months. The accumulative mortality rate in the non-radiation ( n=53 ) , WBRT ( n=33 ) and WBRT+ Boost ( n=56 ) groups was 92％, 79％ and 73％, and the accumulative failure rate ( death or new/relapsed brain metastasis) was 94％, 82％ and 80％, respectively. Compared with the non-radiation group, WBRT and WBRT+Boost therapies exerted significant effect upon OS ( P=0. 000 and 0. 000) and IPFS ( P=0. 000 and 0. 000) . Compared with WBRT alone, WBRT+ Boost treatment exerted no significant effect upon OS ( P=0. 41 and 0. 51) . Conclusions WBRT can significantly improve OS and IPFS of patients with SCLC-BM. However, concurrent and additional radiation boost does not further improve the survival rate.