ABSTRACT
Nowadays technics for Helicobacter pylori detection in stools like culture, and PCR, are expensive and difficult to perform. The aim of this study was to evaluate ELISA test efficacy for detection of H. Pylori antigens in stools comparing this results with standarized technics like histology (Giemsa), ureasa test and UBT C 14. 26 patients were evaluated in this study, ages between 15-75 with upper gastrointestinal symptoms; all of them required gastroduodenal endoscopy, status H. Pylori was determined with methods upon mentioned. 24 hours after endoscopy H. Pylori antigens in stools with the technique Premier Platinum Htsa, Elisa were determined. The detection of H. Pylori antigens in stools accurately identified active H. Pylori infection. The performance characteristics of this non-invasive method was similar in sensibility and specificity to conventional tests
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Antigens, Bacterial , Feces , Helicobacter Infections , Helicobacter pylori , Immunoenzyme Techniques , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To define the role of virtual gastroscopy (VG) in the detection of elevated lesions comparing its results with conventional endoscopy (CE) as the gold standard method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between December 2000 and July 2001, 19 patients were evaluated. The age ranged between 41 and 72 (mean 58.8 years old). VG and CE were performed in all the patients during the same week. VG were carried out with a multislice CT scanner (Mx 8000, Marconi Medical Systems). The technical parameters used were 3 mm with slices and 1.5 mm reconstruction intervals. The acquisition time was 22 seconds. Images were sent to a workstation (MxView, Marconi Medical Systems) where they were reprocessed in three different ways: 1) Bidimensionally 2) Tridimensionally 3) Virtual Endoscopy Findings of VG were compared with CE. RESULTS: VG detected 39 lesions, whereas CE detected 40 lesions. There were 39 true-positive findings, 2 true-negative findings, 0 false-positive findings and 1 false-negative findings. The Sensitivity (Se) was 97.5%; Specificity (Sp) was 100%, positive predictive value 100% and Negative predictive value 66%. CONCLUSIONS: VG is a new non-invasive method with high Se and Sp in the detection of elevated lesions. The actual role of VG consist in identification of gastric lesions and possibility to diagnose gastric disease