Comparison on efficacy and safety between domestic levosimendan versus dobutamine for patients with acute decompensated heart failure / 中华心血管病杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compare the efficacy and safety of domestic levosimendan versus dobutamine for patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>ADHF patients from 8 medical centers were recruited in this multicenter, blind, positive-controlled, randomized study and received 24 h intravenous levosimendan (n = 114) or dobutamine (n = 114) therapy. SWAN-GANZ catheter was performed in patients with pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) ≥ 15 mm Hg (1 mm Hg = 0.133 kPa) and cardiac index (CI) ≤ 2.5 L·min(-1)×m(-2) (n = 39 each).</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Compared with baseline level, LVEF increased [(31.56 ± 9.69)% vs. (28.44 ± 7.08)%, P < 0.01] at 24 h in both groups. LVEF increase at 24 h was similar between two groups [(3.11 ± 6.90)% vs. (3.00 ± 6.63)%, P > 0.05]. The PCWP decrease at 24 h was significantly greater in levosimendan group than in dobutamine group [(-8.90 ± 7.14) mm Hg vs. (-5.64 ± 6.83) mm Hg, P = 0.04]. Decrease in NT-proBNP at 3 days was also more significant in levosimendan group than in dobutamine group [the percentage change compared to baseline: (-22.36 ± 38.98)% vs. (-8.56 ± 42.42)%, P < 0.01]. Dyspnea improvement at 24 h was more significant in levosimendan group than in dobutamine group. The incidences of adverse reactions and events were similar between two groups.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>LVEF improvement is similar between dobutamine and domestic levosimendan while greater decreases in PCWP and NT-proBNP are achieved with domestic levosimendan in patients with ADHF.</p>

Application of intraoperative arterial pressure-based cardiac output monitoring for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery / 中华医学杂志(英文版)

<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>For patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG), it is important to establish a hemodynamic monitoring system to obtain powerful parameters for better intraoperative treatment. This study aimed to observe the clinical feasibility of arterial pressure-based cardiac output (APCO) for cardiac output (CO) monitoring and to evaluate the correlation between APCO and pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) for CO measurement for patients undergoing OPCABG intraoperatively.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Fifty patients of American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) classification II-III, undergoing elective OPCABG at Beijing Anzhen Hospital were randomly enrolled into this study. All patients were assigned to CO monitoring by PAC and APCO simultaneously. Patients with pacemaker, severe valvular heart disease, left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) < 40%, cardiac arrhythmias, peripheral vascular disease, application of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) and emergent diversion to cardiac pulmonary bypass were excluded. The radial artery waveform was analyzed to estimate the stroke volume (SV) and heart rate (HR) continuously. CO was calculated as SV ' HR; other derived parameters were cardiac index (CI), stroke volume index (SVI), systemic vascular resistance (SVR), and systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI). PAC was placed via right internal jugular vein and the correct position was confirmed by PAC waveforms. Continuous cardiac output (CCO), CI and other hemodynamic parameters were monitored at following 5 time points: immediate after anesthesia induction (baseline value), anastomosis of left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending artery (LAD), anastomosis of left circumflex (LCX), anastomosis of posterior descending artery (PDA) and immediate after sternal closure.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>In the 50 patients, preoperative echocardiography measured left ventricular EF was (52.8 ± 11.5)%, and 35 patients (70%) showed regional wall motion abnormalities. The correlation coefficient of CO monitored by APCO and PAC were 0.70, 0.59, 0.78, 0.74 and 0.85 at each time point. The bias range of CI monitored from both APCO and PAC were (0.39 ± 0.06) L×min(-1)×m(-2), (0.48 ± 0.12) L×min(-1)×m(-2), (0.26 ± 0.06) L×min(-1)×m(-2), (0.27 ± 0.06) L×min(-1)×m(-2), (0.30 ± 0.05) L×min(-1)×m(-2) at each time point. The results of SVR by two hemodynamic monitoring techniques had good correlation during OPCABG. The variation trends of SVR were opposite comparing with the results of CO. SVR collected from PAC obtained the highest value of (1220.0 ± 254.0) dyn×s×cm(-5) at PDA anastomosis, but the highest value obtained from APCO was (1206.0 ± 226.5) dyn×s×cm(-5) in LCX anastomosis.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>APCO is feasible in hemodynamic monitoring for patients undergoing OPCABG. The results of hemodynamic monitoring derived from APCO and PAC are closely correlated. Its characterizations of timely, accurate and continuous display of hemodynamic parameters are also obviously demonstrated in the present study.</p>

Ketamine-Propofol Mixture Anesthesia for 85 Children with Congenital Heart Disease Undergoing Cardiac Catheterization / 实用儿科临床杂志

Objective To evaluate the safety and feasibility of ketamine-propofol mixture anesthesia for 85 children with congenital heart disease undergoing cardiac catheterization.Methods Eighty-five children with congenital heart disease undergoing cardiac cathete-rization were randomly divided into ketamine group(K group,n=44)and ketamin-propofol group(KP group,n=41).K group:1 mg?kg-1 ketamine was injected intravenously and then infused at 50 ?g?kg-1?min-1 for anesthesia maintenance.KP group:anesthesia was induced with ketamine 1 mg?kg-1 and propofol 1 mg?kg-1 intravenously,and maintained by continuous infusion of ketamine(16.7 ?g?kg-1?min-1)and propofol(33.3 ?g?kg-1?min-1).Electrocardiogram,blood pressure,pluse,respiratory frequency,saturation of blood oxygen were continously monitored.Results Hemodynamic and respiratory function were stable in both 2 groups.Ketamine consumption in K group was significantly more than that in KP group[(52.1?2.8)?g?kg-1?min-1 vs(25.3?7.3)?g?kg-1?min-1],eye opening time and recovery time were also longer in K group than those in KP group [(50.2?16.5)min vs(40.4?18.3)min].Conclusion The ketamine-propofol mixture was a safe,efficacy anesthesia with excellent recovery in children with congenital heart disease undergoing cardiac catheterization.