Factors Affecting Test Results and Standardized Method in Quiet Standing Balance Evaluation

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors affecting test results of the quiet standing balance evaluation conducted by posturography and to investigate the standardized method by comparing results according to feet width. METHOD: The study cohort consisted of 100 healthy individuals. We assessed the quiet standing balance of subjects by using 3 different methods: standing on a force plate with feet width the same as shoulder width (test 1); with feet width the same as half the shoulder width (test 2); with feet width determined by the subject's comfort (test 3). Subjects underwent each test with their eyes open and closed for 30 seconds each time. Parameters for measuring standing balance included the mean mediolateral and anteroposterior extent, speed, and the velocity moment of center of pressure (COP) movement. RESULTS: All parameters showed better results when the subject's eyes were open rather than closed, and the mean AP extent and speed increased as the age of the subjects increased (p<0.01). However, there was no significant correlation between height and the study parameters, and no differences between men and women. Mean mediolateral extent and speed were significantly longer and faster in test 1 compared with tests 2 and 3 (p<0.01). The results of test 2 were better than the results of test 3, but the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: COP movements increased with age and when subjects closed their eyes in an evaluation of quiet standing balance conducted by posturography. Gender and height did not affect results of the test. We suggest that an appropriate method for conducting posturography is to have the subject stand on a force plate with their feet width the same as half the shoulder width, because this posture provided relatively accurate balance capacity.

Improvement of Quiet Standing Balance in Patients with Wallenberg Syndrome after Rehabilitation

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate quiet standing balance of patients with Wallenberg syndrome before and after rehabilitation. METHOD: Six patients with Wallenberg syndrome were enrolled within one month after being affected by an infarct of the lateral medulla. Quiet standing balance was assessed using posturography with eyes open and closed. The assessment was repeated after the patients had undergone rehabilitation treatment for three to nine months, and the results of the two assessments were compared. RESULTS: The quiet standing balance evaluation was performed by measurement of center of pressure (CoP) movement. In the initial test, the mean scores of mediolateral and anteroposterior speed, velocity movement, mediolateral and anteroposterior extent of CoP were all high, indicating impairments of quiet standing balance in the patients. After rehabilitation treatment, the anteroposterior speed and extent, the mediolateral speed and extent, and velocity moment of CoP showed statistically significant reductions in the eyes open condition (p<0.05), and the anteroposterior speed and extent and velocity moment of CoP had decreased in the eyes closed condition (p<0.05). Mediolateral speed and extent of CoP in the eyes closed condition had also decreased, but the reduction was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated improvements of quiet standing balance, especially anteroposterior balance, in patients with Wallenberg syndrome following rehabilitation. We suggest that balance training is important in the rehabilitation of Wallenberg syndrome and that, as an objective measure of balance status, posturography is useful in the assessment of quiet standing balance.