Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
The Korean Journal of Pain ; : 109-115, 2015.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-164810

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study sought to determine safe ranges of oblique angle, skin entry point and needle length by reviewing computed tomography (CT) scans and to evaluate the usefulness of a bent tip needle during celiac plexus block (CPB). METHODS: CT scans of 60 CPB patients were reviewed. Image of the uppermost margin of L2 vertebral body was used to measure the minimal and maximal oblique angles and the distances from the midline to skin puncture point. The imaginary needle trajectory distance was calculated by three-dimensional measurement. When the procedure was performed by using a 10degrees bent tip needle under a 20degrees oblique X-ray fluoroscopic view, the distance (GF/G'F) from the midline to the actual puncture site was measured. RESULTS: The imaginary safe oblique angle range was 26.4-34.2degrees and 27.7-36.0degrees on the right and left, respectively. The distance from the midline to skin puncture point was 6.1-7.6 cm on the right and 6.3-7.6 cm on the left. The needle trajectory distance at minimal angle was 9.6-11.6 cm on the right and 9.5-11.5 cm on the left. The distance of GF/G'F was 5.1-6.5 cm and 5.0-6.4 cm on the right and left, respectively. All imaginary parameters were correlated with BMI except for GF/G'F. All complications were mild and transient. CONCLUSIONS: We identified safe values of angles and distances using a straight needle. Furthermore, using a bent tip needle under a 20degrees oblique fluoroscopic view, we could safely perform CPB with smaller parameter values.


Subject(s)
Humans , Celiac Plexus , Fluoroscopy , Needles , Punctures , Skin , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Visceral Pain
2.
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology ; : 168-171, 2013.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-59804

ABSTRACT

The case of a 33-day-old boy with Pierre Robin syndrome using a Cook(R) airway exchange catheter in laryngeal mask airway-guided fiberoptic intubation is presented. After induction with sevoflurane, classical reusable laryngeal mask airway (LMA) #1 was inserted and ultrathin fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) was passed through. A Cook(R) airway exchange catheter (1.6 mm ID, 2.7 mm OD) was passed through the LMA under the guidance of the FOB but failed to enter the trachea despite many trials. Then, an endotracheal tube (3.0 mm ID) was mounted on the FOB and railroaded over the FOB. After successful intubation, the Cook(R) airway exchange catheter was placed in the midtrachea through the lumen of the endotracheal tube. Even though the tracheal tube was accidentally displaced out of the trachea during LMA removal, the endotracheal tube could be easily railroaded over the airway exchange catheter.


Subject(s)
Humans , Infant, Newborn , Bronchoscopes , Catheters , Intubation , Laryngeal Masks , Methyl Ethers , Pierre Robin Syndrome , Railroads , Songbirds , Trachea
3.
Yonsei Medical Journal ; : 1197-1202, 2012.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-183493

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We investigated the effect of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RLRP) in patients at low risk of developing PONV, in comparison to balanced anesthesia with desflurane. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty two patients were randomly assigned to the Des or TIVA group. Propofol and remifentanil were used for induction of anesthesia in both groups and for maintenance of the anesthesia in the TIVA group. In the Des group, anesthesia was maintained with desflurane and remifentanil. In both groups, postoperative pain was controlled using fentanyl-based intravenous patient controlled analgesia, and ramosetron 0.3 mg was administered at the end of surgery. The incidence of PONV, severity of nausea and pain, and requirements of rescue antiemetics and analgesics were recorded. RESULTS: The incidence of nausea in the post-anesthetic care unit was 22.6% in the Des group and 6.5% in the TIVA (p=0.001) group. The incidence of nausea at postoperative 1-6 hours was 54.8% in the Des group and 16.1% in the TIVA group (p=0.001). At postoperative 6-48 hours, there were no significant differences in the incidence of nausea between groups. CONCLUSION: In order to prevent PONV after RLRP in the early postoperative period, anesthesia using TIVA with propofol is required regardless of patient-related risk factors.


Subject(s)
Aged , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Anesthesia, Intravenous/methods , Laparoscopy/methods , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/prevention & control , Propofol/administration & dosage , Prostatectomy/methods , Vomiting/prevention & control
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL