ABSTRACT
Objective The aim of this systematic review was to compare the clinical effectiveness of systemic antibiotics administered in the active stage of periodontal treatment or after the healing phase. Material and Methods An electronic search was performed in the databases EMBASE, MEDLINE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement. A manual search of the reference list of selected studies and of review articles was also performed up to November 2013. Randomized Clinical Trials (RCT) that evaluated the systemic administration of antibiotics as adjuvants to scaling and root planning (SRP) at different phases of periodontal treatment were included. Systematic reviews and studies that evaluated subjects with systemic diseases and those that used subantimicrobial doses of antibiotics were excluded. Results The initial search identified 1,039 articles, of which seven were selected, and only one met the inclusion criteria. This study showed that subjects taking metronidazole and amoxicillin at the initial phase of treatment exhibited statistically significantly greater reduction in pocket depth and gain in clinical attachment level in initially deep sites (PD≥7 mm) than subjects taking antibiotics after healing (p<0.05). This comparison was conducted 2 months after antibiotic intake, at the healing phase. Conclusion To date, only one short-term RCT has directly compared different moments of systemic antibiotics administration, as adjuncts to SRP, in the treatment of periodontitis. Although the results of this study suggested some benefits for antibiotics intake during the active phase of therapy, these findings need to be confirmed by larger placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials with longer follow-up periods. .
Subject(s)
Humans , Amoxicillin/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Metronidazole/administration & dosage , Periodontitis/drug therapy , Wound Healing/drug effects , Dental Scaling/methods , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Reproducibility of Results , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Apesar de micro-organismos do domínio Archaea já terem sido detectados em amostras de biofilme subgengival de indivíduos com periodontite, nenhum estudo comparou diretamente a associação de Archaea com as periodontites crônica e agressiva. Assim sendo, o objetivo desse estudo foi avaliar a prevalência do domínio Archaea em indivíduos com periodontite crônica generalizada (PCrG), periodontite agressiva generalizada (PAgG) e indivíduos com saúde periodontal (SP), e correlacionar os achados microbiológicos com o aumento da profundidade de sondagem (PS). Foram selecionados 15 indivíduos com PCrG, 15 com PAgG e 15 com SP. Inicialmente, os indivíduos foram submetidos ao exame clínico-periodontal. Em seguida, amostras de biofilme subgengival foram coletadas de 9 sítios nos indivíduos do grupo SP e de 9 sítios (PS <3mm, 3 PS 4-6mm e 3 PS >7mm) nos indivíduos dos grupos PCrG e PAgG. Após a extração do DNA, as amostras foram submetidas à reação de amplificação do gene 16S rRNA de Archaea. A presença de Archaeafoi detectada em 11/15 indivíduos do grupo PCrG, em 9/15 indivíduos com PAgG e 12/15 indivíduos com SP (p>0,05). Em relação ao número de amostras positivas, foram 21 no grupo SP, 39 no PAgG e 43 no PCrG observados. Não foram observadas diferenças estatísticas entre os diferentes grupos experimentais (p>0,05) e também não houve correlação entre a presença de Archaea e as diferentes categorias de profundidade de sondagem. Em conclusão, sugere-se ausência de associação entre a detecção de Archaea e a periodontite.
Archaea has been detected in subgingival biofilm samples from individuals with periodontitis, however, no studies were found to enable a direct comparison of the association of Archaea with chronic and aggressive periodontitis. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the prevalence of the Archaea domine in individuals with generalized chronic periodontitis (GCrP), generalized aggressive periodontitis (GAgP) and periodontal healthy (PH) and correlation these finding with the increase of probing depth (PD). Fifteen individuals with GCrP, fifteen individuals with GAgP and fifteen individuals with PH were selected. The individuals were submitted a clinical periodontal examination. Subgingival biofilm samples were collected from 9 sites in the PH group and 9 sites (3 PD ¡Ü3mm, 3 PD 4-6mm and 3 PD ¡Ý7mm) in the 30 individuals in the GAgP and GCrP groups. After the DNA extraction, the presence of Archaea was analyzed by polymerase chair reaction (PCR). The occurrence of Archaea was detected in 11/15 individuals in the GCrP group, 9/15 individuals with GAgP and 12/15 individuals with SP (p>0.05). Among the individuals of with SP, PAgG and PCrG, 21, 39 and 43 samples were positive for Archaea, respectively. However, there were no statistical differences observed among experimental groups (p>0.05). There was no correlation between the presence of Archaea and the different probing depth categories. In conclusion, these results suggest the absence of association between the detection of Archaeaand periodontitis.