ABSTRACT
Six mark-release-recapture experiments with Anopheles saperoi Bohart and Ingram were performed in the Yona Forest, northern Okinawa, Japan from June 1998 - November 1999, in order to estimate the gonotrophic cycle, survival, spatial distribution, flight range, and population size of An. saperoi. Adults and immature An. saperoi were collected from the Yona Forest area, taken to the laboratory and maintained under a controlled temperature and humidity in order to get a lager number of mosquitos for the mark-release-recapture experiments. Cohorts of An. saperoi females and males, numbering 3,016, 4,728, 327, and 2,603 for experiments I, II, III, and IV, respectively, were released. Cohorts of An. saperoi females only, numbering 709 and 586 for experiments V and VI, respectively, were also released. At the release site, the An. saperoi were marked with 0.5% fluorescent dye Rhodamine B and released. The recapture rates were 14 (0.93%), 33 (1.40%), 3 (1.83%), 32 (2.46%), 14 (1.97%), and 22 (3.75%) for experiments 1, II, III, IV, V, and VI, respectively. The length of the gonotrophic cycle of the recaptured An. saperoi females was estimated to be about 4 days, through the dissection method. The daily survival rate was estimated to be 0.73 by regression coefficient. The spatial distribution of marked, recaptured An. saperoi was similar to that of unmarked captured An. saperoi. The spatial distribution of the marked, recaptured An. saperoi among the collection site categories was significantly different. The observed differences in the frequency distribution of marked recaptured An. saperoi were considered to be due to the spatial variation of the habitats between the collection sites. The maximum flight range of the recaptured An. saperoi recorded in this study was 0.93 km. The population size of An. saperoi females in the study area was estimated by the Seber method to be 23,841, 1,182, 3,514, 5,679, and 9,238 for experiments I, II, IV, V, and VI, respectively. The estimated population size has a low standard of error using the Seber method, therefore we estimated our population size reasonably well. The population attributes and ecology of An. saperoi in the Yona Forest, in northern Okinawa are discussed.
Subject(s)
Animals , Anopheles/parasitology , Female , Geography , Insect Vectors , Japan , Male , Mosquito Control , Population SurveillanceABSTRACT
A malaria mosquito vector, Anopheles saperoi, and a non-vector, Aedes albopictus, were allowed to feed on mice infected with murine malaria, Plasmodium yoelii nigeriensis, and were subsequently monitored for the development of parasites by the nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method, using Plasmodium genus-specific primer pairs. The mosquitos were divided into two parts, head/thorax and abdomen, for DNA analyses. The parasite DNA and murine DNA for each mosquito were examined in parallel. In both groups of mosquitos, murine DNA was detected up to 4 days post-blood meal in both the head/thorax and abdomen. After 4 days, the murine DNA fell below detectable limits. Murine DNA and parasite DNA remained undigested for the first 4 days post-blood meal. Parasite DNA was detected in the abdomen of 25% (3/12) of Ae. albopictus on day five and 10% (1/10) on day six, after murine DNA had fallen below detectable limits. Parasite DNA was not detected in the head/thorax of Ae. albopictus on those days or afterwards in either the head/thorax or abdomen, demonstrating that the parasite detected on days 5 and 6 in the abdomen degenerated and did not develop into mature oocysts or sporozoites. In the vector An. saperoi, parasite DNA was detected continuously in the head/thorax and abdomen for many days after the murine DNA had fallen below detectable limits. The detection rate of parasite DNA in the head/thorax of An. saperoi increased gradually from day 8 post blood meal until it reached a maximum level of 71.4% (15/21 12 days post-infection. Parasite DNA in abdomen reached its maximum level of 81% (17/21) 10 days post-blood meal. The implications of these results for the design and interpretation of epidemiological surveys is discussed.