ABSTRACT
Background and Aim: Isolation of H. pylori from gastric mucosal biopsy specimens is a prerequisite for further studies addressing drug susceptibility testing, analysis and characterization of virulence factors, molecular epidemiology studying or other comparative studies. In this study, we used a modified enriched culture medium with short incubation time to improve the isolation rate of H. pylori from the clinical specimens. Methods: Between October 2008 and October 2009, 266 dyspeptic patients attending the endoscopy ward of Motahhary Clinic of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, were investigated. The biopsy samples were cultured on two selective media called M1, which we used in our previous studies, and a modified medium called M2. The cultures were kept in a microaerophilic atmosphere at 37 °C. The plates were inspected first on day 1, and then on daily basis for a total of 10 days. The isolates were confirmed as H. pylori by colony morphology and positive oxidase, catalase and rapid urease tests. We used the same media and culture conditions to subculture the isolates for several times. Specimens were considered to be H. pylori positive if either the culture or two of the three diagnostic methods yielded positive results. . Results: The isolation rate of H. pylori strains from the samples was significantly higher on M2 in comparison with M1 medium (p<0.05). The bacterial growth on M2 was observed after a significantly shorter time (p<0.05), i.e., after incubation for about 24 hrs. Following these procedures, the preservation time could be extended beyond 6 months without a significant loss of viability. Conclusion: The modified culture technique enabled a shorter incubation time and a higher isolation rate for H.pylori obtained from clinical samples .
ABSTRACT
Nosocomial infections caused by methicillin-resistant staphylococci (MRSA) pose a serious problem in many countries. This study aimed to determine the antibacterial susceptibility patterns of methicillin sensitive and resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from the hospitalized patients. Totally 356 isolates of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) including 200, 137 and 19 corresponding to MSSA, MRSA, and intermediate MRSA strains, respectively were isolated. Antibacterial susceptibility patterns of the isolates to 14 antibiotics were examined using Kirby-Bauer method. MICs of 15 antibiotics to 156 MRSA isolates were determined by E test method. Cross-resistances of MRSA isolates (137+19) to the other tested antibiotics were also determined. S.aureus with high frequencies were isolated from the blood, sputum and deep wound samples. All of 200 MSSA isolates were sensitive to oxacillin, vancomycin, tecoplanin, rifampin, linezolid, quinupristin/dalfopristin, mupirocin and fusidic acid. A gradient of reduced susceptibility of MSSA to cephalexin, co-trimoxazole, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, tetracycline, erythromycin and gentamicin were evident. MRSA isolates were sensitive to vancomycin, tecoplanin, linezolid, quinupristin/dalfopristin, mupirocin and fusidic acid, while reduced susceptibility of them to rifampin, co-trimoxazole, clindamycin, cephalexin, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin and gentamicin were observed. MRSA isolates exhibited a high range of cross-resistance to the eight tested antibiotics. Overall, co-trimoxazole, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, tetracycline, erythromycin and gentamicin showed low activity against MSSA and MRSA isolates which may indicate they are not suitable to be used in clinical practices. To preserve the effectiveness of antibiotics, rational prescription and concomitant application of preventive measures against the spread of MRSA are recommended.