Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Chinese Journal of Medical Science Research Management ; (4): 178-181, 2023.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-995852

ABSTRACT

Objective:This stndy aims to analyze the influence of ChatGPT on medical research and give suggestions on GhatGPT.Methods:This paper expounded the background of ChatGPT, analyze the connection between ChatGPT and medical research management, application and threats of ChatGPT , and gave suggestions to avoid GhatGPT′s damage.Results:Technology will promote the evolution of medical research management. It is recommended to strengthen the supervision of the ChatGPT and research integrity education.Conclusions:It is urgent to establish a scientific management mechanism to take usage the advantages of GhatGPT.

2.
Chinese Journal of Medical Science Research Management ; (4): 293-298, 2020.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-872069

ABSTRACT

Objective:To construct a scientific research performance evaluation index system for specialized hospitals based on disciplinary development.Methods:Building a preliminary evaluation index framework of scientific research performance through literature review and expert consultation meetings, combined with the strategic goals of strengthening specialization and weakening generalization; Delphi method was adopted to conduct two rounds questionnaires survey to collect the importance scores for each index, which confirmed the content of the index system; finally, applied the analytic hierarchy process to calculate the weight coefficient of each index.Results:The responding rates of the two rounds questionnaire survey reached 95%, and the authoritative coefficients were 0.75 and 0.76, respectively. The research results were reliable. The coordination coefficients of all levels of the two surveys were greater than 0.1, according to the significance testing, the P values were less than 0.05, and the expert opinions were well coordinated. Finally, we developed a three-level scientific research performance evaluation system under the guidance of disciplinary development, which including 3 first-level indicators, 20 second-level indicators, as well as 56 third-level indicators. Conclusions:A scientific research performance evaluation system was constructed based on scientific theories. This system combined relevant indicators, such as the development of special disciplinary of specialized hospitals with scientific validity and operability. Besides, it could serve as a tool to evaluate the scientific research performance of specialized hospitals taking into account of the practical application value for guiding scientific research development and disciplinary improvement.

3.
Chinese Journal of Medical Science Research Management ; (4): 345-347, 2016.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-502557

ABSTRACT

Science is the power of improving the academic discipline in hospitals.Evaluation of research has always be the key issue for research management.Using stratification method to establish the evaluation system was constructed directly by high level research output and based on the process of scientific,which can conduct quantitative assessment for individual level.The contents included three parts:process indicators,basic achievement indicators and high level achievements indicators.The implementation effect was satisfied during last year.The evaluation system stimulates high level research output.

4.
Chinese Journal of Medical Science Research Management ; (4): 464-467, 2015.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-489520

ABSTRACT

Objective To analyze current situation of incentive mechanism and investigate the countermeasures.Provide the evidence for improving the incentive mechanism of scientific research at the hospital.Methods Questionnaire survey was conducted to investigate current situation and countermeasures of incentive mechanism of scientific research.Database was building using EpiData3.1,and was performed by descriptive analysis.Results 194 questionnaires were available.For the current incentive mechanism,86.5% respondents thought the content is comprehensive,The over 50 years old,bachelor or below,and clinical examination group thought the content were less comprehensive.Respectively,81%,82.5%,76.2% of respondents thought stimulation on achievements has positive effect to research,team work,and individual accounted for.The over 41 years old college or bellow,clinical treatment group felt less effect.For improving measures of incentive mechanism,the top three positions of contents were technological reward,high level project and SCI paper;and incentive methods were promotion,material rewards and training.Conclusions Incentive mechanism can promote scientific research to some extent.To further promote scientific research development,individual incentive measures need to be taken,the contents need to be expanded,variety incentive methods need to be used.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL