ABSTRACT
Introduction: transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is still the gold standard treatment of prostatic obstruction. The objective of the present study is to compare the bleeding complications of TURP with and without the participation of residents. Material and methods: The data was obtained from a prospective protocol that included 200 patients submitted to TURP. Eleven patients were excluded from the study (5,5 percent). No patient was lost from follow-up. Results: Were viewed 189 surgeries, 46 with resident participation (24,3 percent). The operations performed by residents were more prolonged, and required more days with bladder drainage. The following bleeding complications were observed: 1) Bladder catheter washing to solve obstruction by clots: 11,6 percent, 2) Endoscopic revision in severe hematuria: 2,6 percent, 3) Readmission to the hospital in complete urinary retention secondary to clots: 2,1 percent and 4) Blood transfusion: 2,1 percent. The transfusion rate was significantly higher in resident surgeries (6,5 percent versus 0,7 percent, p=0,045), without differences in the other bleeding complications. Conclusion: The rate of bleeding complications is comparable to that recently published. Applying strict criterion for blood transfusion, no difference was observed between the groups. At our institution, the process of teaching and learning TURP does not increase significantly the risk of bleeding complications.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Hemorrhage , Transurethral Resection of Prostate/adverse effects , Transurethral Resection of Prostate/methods , Transurethral Resection of Prostate/trends , Chile , Prostatic Diseases/surgery , Prostatic Diseases/complicationsSubject(s)
Humans , Male , Adolescent , Adult , Varicocele/epidemiology , Chile , Varicocele/complications , Varicocele/etiology , Varicocele/history , Varicocele , Varicocele/therapyABSTRACT
This paper is a short biography of Galen that lived during the of reign Adrianus, between the years 129 and 216 AD. Satirus, Estratonicus and Escrion were his makers and he lived in Alexandria, Pergamus and Rome. He had difficult relationships with his contemporary colleagues due to his revolutionary medical concepts, but had important contributions to the knowledge of medicine