ABSTRACT
Resumo Fundamento O escore Selvester QRS (S-QRS) em um eletrocardiograma (ECG) de 12 derivações está associado tanto à quantidade de cicatriz miocárdica quanto ao mau prognóstico em pacientes com infarto do miocárdio. Entretanto, seu valor prognóstico na insuficiência cardíaca (IC) com fração de ejeção preservada (ICFEp) é desconhecido. Objetivo Este estudo tem como objetivo investigar o valor preditivo do escore S-QRS para mortalidade na ICFEp. Métodos 359 pacientes foram incluídos retrospectivamente neste estudo. As características eletrocardiográficas, ecocardiográficas e laboratoriais dos pacientes foram registradas. O escore S-QRS simplificado foi medido e registrado. O tempo médio de seguimento dos pacientes foi de 38,1±9,5 meses. A significância estatística foi estabelecida em p < 0,05. Resultados Dos 359 pacientes, 270 estavam no grupo sobrevivente e 89 no grupo falecido. Idade, PCR-us, troponina, pro-BNP, diâmetro do átrio esquerdo (AE), índice de volume do AE, duração do QRS, Tpe e escore do S-QRS foram estatisticamente altos no grupo falecido. Na análise de regressão logística multivariada, idade, PCR-us, NT-proBNP, diâmetro do AE, índice de volume do AE, Tpe e escore S-QRS mostraram-se fatores de risco independentes para mortalidade. Na análise da característica operacional do receptor (ROC), o valor de corte do escore S-QRS foi de 5,5, a sensibilidade foi de 80,8% e a especificidade foi de 77,2% (AUC: 0,880, p:0,00). Na análise de Kaplan-Meier, verificou-se que a mortalidade foi maior no grupo com escore S-QRS ≥ 5,5 do que no grupo com escore S-QRS < 5,5. (Long-rank, p:0,00) Conclusão Acreditamos que o escore S-QRS pode ser usado como um indicador prognóstico de mortalidade a longo prazo em pacientes com ICFEp.
Abstract Background The Selvester QRS (S-QRS) score on a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is associated with both the amount of myocardial scar and poor prognosis in myocardial infarction patients. However, its prognostic value in heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is unknown. Objective This study aims to investigate the predictive value of the S-QRS score for mortality in HFpEF. Methods 359 patients were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and laboratory features of the patients were recorded. The simplified S-QRS score was measured and recorded. The mean follow-up time of the patients was 38.1±9.5 months. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results Of 359 patients, 270 were in the survivor group, and 89 were in the deceased group. Age, Hs-CRP, troponin, pro-BNP, left atrial (LA) diameter, LA volume index, QRS duration, Tpe, and S-QRS score were statistically high in the deceased group. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, age, Hs-CRP, NT-proBNP, LA diameter, LA volume index, Tpe, and S-QRS score were shown to be independent risk factors for mortality. In the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the cut-off value of the S-QRS score was 5.5, the sensitivity was 80.8%, and the specificity was 77.2% (AUC:0.880, p:0.00). In Kaplan-Meier analysis, it was found that mortality was higher in the group with S-QRS score ≥ 5.5 than in the group with S-QRS score < 5.5. (Long-rank, p:0.00) Conclusions We think that the S-QRS score can be used as a prognostic indicator of long-term mortality in patients with HFpEF.
ABSTRACT
Abstract Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of coronary collateral circulation (CCC) in patients who had undergone coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods: A total of 127 patients who had undergone CABG (2011-2013) were enrolled into this study and follow-up was obtained by phone contact. Patients were categorized into two groups according to preoperative CCC using the Rentrop method. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, heart failure (HF), and mortality rates were compared between groups. Clinical outcome was defined as combined end point including death, PCI, recurrent MI, stroke, and HF. Results: Sixty-two of 127 patients had poor CCC and 65 had good CCC. There were no differences in terms of PCI, recurrent MI, and HF between the groups. Stroke (seven of 62 [11.3%] and one of 65 [1.5%], P=0.026) and mortality (19 of 62 [30.6%] and 10 of 65 [15.4%], P=0.033) rates were significantly higher in poor CCC group than in good CCC group. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, survival time was not statistically different between the groups. Presence of poor CCC resulted in a significantly higher combined end point incidence (P=0.011). Conclusion: Stroke, mortality rates, and combined end point incidence were significantly higher in poor CCC patients than in the good CCC group.