ABSTRACT
Preanaesthetic medication should be effective and pleasant to be taken orally, have analgesic and non-emetic properties, should not impair cardiovascular stability or depress respiration and produce adequate sedation and anxiolysis. We wanted to compare the effectiveness of oral clonidine and oral midazolam as preanaesthetic medicants.METHODSAfter obtaining the institutional ethical committee clearance and written informed consent, 60 patients, selected for surgery under general anaesthesia were divided by computer generated randomization in Group C (n=30): received Tablet clonidine 150 mcg (0.15 mg) and Group M (n=30): received Tablet midazolam 7.5 mg. Noninvasive blood pressure (systolic, diastolic & mean), respiratory rate, heart rate, degree of sedation, degree of anxiolysis, were recorded at, just before the administration of the any study drug which was 90 minutes before to the induction of anaesthesia, just before to induction of anaesthesia, three minutes after the orotracheal intubation, every 10 minutes for 3 such readings, and three minutes after the orotracheal extubation, and were statistically analysed.RESULTSOral clonidine produced significant attenuation of systolic, diastolic & mean arterial pressure, and reduced respiratory rate, than oral midazolam. Oral midazolam was able to attenuate the pulse rate in a better way than oral clonidine. Oral clonidine produced significant sedation and anxiolysis in comparison to patients who receiving oral midazolam.CONCLUSIONSOral clonidine is the better attenuator amongst the two drugs studied as premedicants to attenuate the cardiovascular responses to laryngoscopy and intubation.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We compared intraocular pressure changes following laryngoscopy and intubation with conventional Macintosh blade and Airtraq optical laryngoscope. METHODS: Ninety adult patients were randomly assigned to study group or control group. Study group (n = 45) - Airtraq laryngoscope was used for laryngoscopy. Control group (n = 45) - conventional Macintosh laryngoscope was used for laryngoscopy. Preoperative baseline intraocular pressure was measured with Schiotz tonometer. Laryngoscopy was done as per group protocol. Intraocular pressure and haemodynamic parameters were recorded just before insertion of the device and subsequently three times at an interval of one minute after insertion of the device. RESULTS: Patient characteristics, baseline haemodynamic parameters and baseline intraocular pressure were comparable in the two groups. Following insertion of the endotracheal tube with Macintosh laryngoscope, there was statistically significant rise in heart rate and intraocular pressure compared to Airtraq group. There was no significant change in MAP. Eight patients in Macintosh group had tongue-lip-dental trauma during intubation, while only 2 patients received upper airway trauma in Airtraq group. CONCLUSION: We conclude that Airtraq laryngoscope in comparison to Macintosh laryngoscope results in significantly fewer rises in intraocular pressure and clinically less marked increase in haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation.
JUSTIFICATIVA: Comparar as alterações de pressão intraocular após laringoscopia e intubação com lâmina Macintosh convencional e laringoscópio óptico Airtraq. MÉTODOS: Noventa pacientes adultos foram randomicamente designados para os grupos estudo ou controle. No grupo estudo (n = 45) o laringoscópio Airtraq foi usado para laringoscopia e no grupo controle (n = 45) o laringoscópio Macintosh convencional foi usado para laringoscopia. A pressão intraocular foi mensurada no pré-operatório com tonômetro Schiotz. A laringoscopia foi feita de acordo com o protocolo de cada grupo. Pressão intraocular e parâmetros hemodinâmicos foram registrados logo antes da inserção do dispositivo e três vezes após a inserção do dispositivo, com intervalo de um minuto. RESULTADOS: As características dos pacientes, os parâmetros hemodinâmicos basais e a PIO basal foram comparáveis nos dois grupos. Após a inserção do tubo endotraqueal com o laringoscópio Macintosh, houve um aumento estatisticamente significativo da frequência cardíaca e da pressão intraocular em comparação com o grupo Airtraq. Não houve alteração significativa da PAM. Oito pacientes do grupo Macintosh sofreram trauma de língua-lábio-dental durante a intubação, enquanto apenas dois pacientes sofreram trauma das vias aéreas superiores no grupo Airtraq. CONCLUSÃO: Concluímos que o laringoscópio Airtraq, em comparação com o laringoscópio Macintosh, resultou em elevações significativamente menores da PIO e em aumentos clinicamente menos acentuados da resposta hemodinâmica à laringoscopia e intubação.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Laryngoscopes/adverse effects , Intraocular Pressure/physiology , Intubation, Intratracheal/adverse effects , Laryngoscopy/adverse effects , Single-Blind Method , Equipment Design , Heart Rate/physiology , Hemodynamics , Intubation, Intratracheal/instrumentation , Laryngoscopy/instrumentation , Middle AgedABSTRACT
Vermicompost is a very important biofertilizer produced through the artificial cultivation of worms i.e. Vermiculture. Vermicompost is enriched with all beneficial soil bacteria and also contain many of the essential plant nutrients like N, P, K and micronutrients. It increases soil aeration, texture and jilt. In this work, study is being carried out to find out the effect of different fertilizers such as DAP, FYM and Vermicompost on various morphological parameters and on the in vitro growth of bacterial colonies and its diversity in relation to two important leguminous plants such as Pisum sp. and Cicer sp. Results showed that plant grown in Vermicompost pretreated soil exhibited maximum increase in all morphological parameters such as root length, shoot length, number of root branches, number of stem branches, number of leaves, number of flowers, number of pods and number of root nodules in four months sampling in comparison to untreated, FYM treated and DAP treated soils. Further in Vermicompost pretreated soil, number of N2 fixing bacterial colony was maximum and showed highest diversity indices (1.6 and 0.99 and 2.0 and 0.99 for Cicer sp. and Pisum sp. respectively) than FYM, DAP and untreated control. Thus not only does the Vermicompost stimulate plant growth but also it increases the N2 fixing bacterial population in soil and also its diversity.