Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Indian Heart J ; 1994 Mar-Apr; 46(2): 71-5
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-5516

ABSTRACT

Long term performance of 163 atrial leads implanted in 158 patients between July 1981 and June 1993 was evaluated. There were 122 DDD and 36 AAI units, with 125 (77%) polyurethane and 38 (23%) silicone leads. One hundred and nine (67%) unipolar and 54 (33%) bipolar leads were used. Patients were followed in the Pacemaker Clinic for 6 to 124 months (mean 50 +/- 39 months). Five patients were lost to follow up. Transient malfunction was observed in 18 cases (sensing 13, pacing 5) within the first 2 weeks. In 13 cases failure to sense subsided spontaneously and in 4 pacing malfunction could be corrected by reprogramming. Lead dislodgement occurred in 4 patients (2.5%), all within the first week. After the 1st month malfunction was uncommon. Between 1 and 12 months undersensing occurred in 4 (2.5%). In 3 cases it could be corrected by reprogramming. In the first year, reoperation was performed in 5 cases for lead related problems (3 dislodgements, 2 insulation failures). Beyond 12 months complications were as follows: failure to sense-8 (5%), failure to pace-3 (2%), insulation break -1 (0.6%). Majority of these problems could be managed by reprogramming. Reoperation was performed in 1 case with insulation break. The pacing mode had to be changed in 5 (3%) patients with dual chamber units who had loss of P wave sensing. During follow-up 98%, 98%, 96%, 95% and 83% of the leads were working satisfactorily at 1,2,3,4 and 9 years respectively. Thus atrial leads have excellent long term performance and an acceptable rate of late malfunction.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Electrodes, Implanted , Equipment Failure , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pacemaker, Artificial/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL