Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Conscientiae Saúde (Online) ; 22: e24112, 01 jun. 2023.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1553237

ABSTRACT

Resumo Introdução: A pandemia da COVID-19 contribuiu para a diminuição das atividades habituais dos idosos, o que pode interferir na capacidade funcional (CF) dos mesmos. Objetivo: Verificar o impacto da inatividade física durante a pandemia da COVID-19 na CF de idosos e associar o nível de atividade física com a CF dos mesmos. Métodos: Participaram do estudo 20 idosos que frequentavam um programa de atividade física antes da pandemia da COVID-19. Foi avaliada a capacidade funcional pelo teste AVD-Glittre, teste de caminhada de 6 minutos (TC6) e Time Up and Go (TUG); os resultados foram comparados com os resultados dos testes obtidos em 2019 (antes da pandemia da COVID-19). Para verificar o nível de atividade física, foi aplicado o Questionário Internacional de Nível de Atividade Física (IPAQ). Os dados foram analisados pelo teste t pareado de Wilcoxon e teste de correlação de Pearson. Resultados: Houve um aumento do tempo da execução do teste de AVD-Glittre de 171.90 ± 35.56 para 272.00 ± 344.77 segundos, no TUG teste de 6.27 ± 119 para 6.92 ± 1.53 segundos, e no TC6 houve uma diminuição de 564.97 ± 85.22 para 464.65 ± 105.95 metros, com p<0.001 em todas as análises. A correlação entre IPAQ e o teste de AVD-Glittre foi fraca (r=0.11, p<0.63), fraca com TC6 (r= -0.10, p>0.001) e moderada com TUG (r=0.59, p>0.001). Conclusão: Houve diminuição da CF dos idosos durante a pandemia da COVID-19, o nível de atividade física influenciou no TUG.


Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic contributed to a decrease in the usual activities of older adults, which may interfere with their functional capacity (FC). Objective: To verify the impact of physical inactivity during the COVID-19 pandemic on the older adults' FC and associate the level of older adults' physical activity with the FC. Methods: The study included 20 older people who attended a physical activity program before the COVID-19 pandemic. Functional capacity was evaluated by the ADL-Glittre test, 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and Time Up and Go (TUG) test. The tests' results were compared to the tests obtained in 2019 (before the COVID-19 pandemic). The International Physical Activity Level Questionnaire (IPAQ) was applied to verify the physical activity level. Data were analyzed using Wilcoxon's paired t-test and Pearson's correlation test. Results: There was an increase in the execution time of the ADL-Glittre test from 171.90 ± 35.56 to 272.00 ± 344.77 seconds, in the TUG test from 6.27 ± 119 to 6.92 ± 1.53 seconds, and in the 6MWT there was a decrease from 564.97 ± 85.22 to 464.65 ± 105.95 meters, with p<0.001 in all analyses. The correlation between IPAQ and the ADL-Glittre test was weak (r=0.11, p<0.63), weak with 6MWT (r= -0.10, p>0.001) and moderate with TUG (r=0.59, p>0.001). Conclusion: There was a decrease in the FC of older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic; the level of physical activity influenced the TUG.

2.
ABCS health sci ; 48: e023222, 14 fev. 2023. tab, ilus
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1516699

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The decline in functional capacity (FC) interferes with the functional independence of older adults, so it is important to assess the FC and use appropriate instruments for this. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the Glittre Activities of Daily Living (ADL) test's validity and reliability for assessing functional capacity in older adults. METHODS: Cross-sectional study with a sample of 100 elderly (68 ± 5.16 years). To assess the convergent validity, the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) and the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) were performed. The intra-examiner test-retest of the Glittre-ADL test was performed on the same day with a 30-minute interval between repetitions and inter-examiner reliability with an interval of seven days. RESULTS: There was a strong correlation between the Glittre-ADL test and the 6MWT (r=-0,75; p<0.001) and the TUG (r=0.77; p<0.001). The intra-examiner and inter-examiner reliability was excellent (ICC)=0.91 and 95% CI=0.14-0.97; p<0.001 and ICC=0.91; 95% CI: 0.86-0.94; p<0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: The Glittre-ADL test demonstrated that it is valid and that its reliability is adequate to assess functional capacity in older adults.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Activities of Daily Living , Exercise , Health of the Elderly , Reproducibility of Results , Cross-Sectional Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL