ABSTRACT
Purpose: This study was conducted to estimate the visual acuity improvement in patients with Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) with the help of low vision devices (LVDs) and to analyze the types of distant and near LVDs prescribed to the patients with LHON. Methods: A retrospective case review of 74 subjects with LHON who were referred to a low vision care clinic at a tertiary eye center from 2016 to 2019 were recruited. The reason for referral was assessed from the patients’ electronic medical records (EMR). Demographic data of the patients, visual acuity status, type of LVD prescribed, and visual acuity improvement with LVD were documented. Results: Out of 74 patients, 91.9% (n = 68) were male, and the median age of patients was 21 (16) years. A 4× monocular telescope was prescribed for 2.7% of patients (n = 2) and SEETV binocular telescope for 1.4% (n = 1) was advised for distance. The most commonly prescribed near LVD was the 6× cutaway stand magnifier for 22 patients (29.7%). Four patients (5.4%) were prescribed with Notex, the most commonly prescribed non?optical LVD. Niki CCTV (12.2%, n=9) was the most commonly prescribed assistive device. The subjects were divided into three groups based on age: group I consisted of those <18 years of age, group II 18–40 years, and group III >40 years for the interpretation of visual improvement. There was a statistically significant improvement (group I: P < 0.001, group II: P < 0.0001, group III: P < 0.003) in near vision with help of LVDs in all three groups. Conclusion: The use of LVDs and rehabilitation can help patients with LHON to lead a better life and will be more beneficial
ABSTRACT
Purpose: The aim of this study was to elucidate the type of low vision devices (LVDs) prescribed for patients with cone dystrophy, cone–rod dystrophy, and rod–cone dystrophy and to analyze the visual improvement with the devices. Methods: A retrospective review of 300 electronic medical records of patients with cone dystrophy, cone–rod dystrophy, and rod–cone dystrophy referred to the low vision care (LVC) clinic for the first time between 2014 and 2016 at a tertiary eye care center was done. Collected data included the demographic profile of patients, details of LVDs, and best?corrected vision. Results: Out of 300 patients, 62.6% (n = 188) were male and 37.3% (n = 112) were female. Of the cases, 50% (n = 150) had cone–rod dystrophy, 45% (n = 135) had cone dystrophy, and 5% (n = 15) had rod–cone dystrophy. The most commonly prescribed LVD was SEE?TV binocular telescope (n = 6, 2.0%) for distance and dome magnifier (n = 60, 20%) for near. ET?40 dark grey tint (20.6%) was preferred for managing photophobia. There was a statistically significant difference in both distance and near visual acuities with LVDs (P < 0.05) in all categories, except rod–cone dystrophy. Conclusion: Early diagnosis with appropriate prescription of LVDs including tints helps in achieving good quality of vision in patients with cone?related dystrophies.