Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 2015 Sept; 63(9): 741-742
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-178911

ABSTRACT

Retinoblastoma is the most common malignant intraocular tumor in pediatric age group if undetected leads to ocular mortality. Prenatal diagnosis is an emerging technology to detect fatal diseases in utero such that subsequent management is planned to reduce the ocular morbidity. We describe a case demonstrating the importance of prenatal diagnosis in a child with a strong family history of retinoblastoma and importance of a long‑term clinical follow‑up in these cases.

2.
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore ; : 531-535, 2006.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-275312

ABSTRACT

<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>The aim of this study was to compare the occurrence of diabetic retinopathy in targeted screening diabetic patients (Group I) with newly diagnosed diabetic patients in general practice (Group II).</p><p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS</b>This was an observational cross-sectional study. Data were obtained from 25,313 subjects who participated in the diabetic screening camps, and 128 newly diagnosed diabetes who presented to the diabetic retinopathy screening camps in general practice in rural and urban south India. The study variables were collected from all patients who underwent eye examination from the target screening detected diabetics [(n = 173) Group I] and those newly diagnosed in general practice [(n = 128) Group II]. The variations in prevalence of diabetic retinopathy and sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy in Group I and Group II and the factors affecting it were identified.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The occurrence of diabetic retinopathy was 6.35% (95% CI, 2.5-9.5) in Group I and 11.71% (95% CI, 5.6-16.4) in Group II. No significant difference was observed on occurrence of diabetic retinopathy, including sightthreatening retinopathy, in rural versus urban population and in Group I versus Group II. Patients diagnosed in general practice (Group II) with systolic blood pressure (BP) >140 were more likely to have retinopathy (P = 0.02).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Diabetic retinopathy including sightthreatening complications was found at the time of diagnosis of diabetes in the targeted screening group as well as in newly diagnosed diabetics in the general practice group.</p>


Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Diabetic Retinopathy , Epidemiology , Family Practice , Hypertension , India , Epidemiology , Mass Screening , Prevalence , Rural Population , Urban Population
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL