ABSTRACT
Background:Knowledge on etiology, risk factors, mode of transmission, signs and symptoms of COVID-19 is an essential element in pandemic control. Assessing the level of knowledge and determining sources from which information were derived is a fundamental element of situation analysis imperative in COVID-19 control.Materials and method: The study is a cross sectional study. All eligible visitors who presented at the general out-patient department for Medicare were enlisted into the study until required sample size was achieved. Pre-tested interviewer administered questionnaire was used to elicit information from respondents. Statistical analysis was done with multinomial logistic regression analysis using SPSS version 23.1 with statistical significance set at 0.05. Ethical approval and permission for the study from relevant authorities were granted.Conclusion:Knowledge of COVID 19 was poor. Higher educational qualification enhances better knowledge. Females, public servants, married persons, respondents who attended tertiary institution and those aged 31-40 years had better knowledge score.Results:Over all composite score for good knowledge was 1037(35.4%) with predominant statistically significant difference in knowledge. There was better knowledge score for females, public servants, married persons, respondents aged 31-40 years and those who had tertiary education
Subject(s)
Humans , Epidemiologic Factors , Patient Medication Knowledge , COVID-19 , Sociology , DemographyABSTRACT
RESUMEN: La larva migrans cutánea es una parasitosis endémica, observada en regiones cálidas, húmedas, tropicales y subtropicales, caracterizada por lesiones cutáneas serpiginosas y pruriginosas, causada frecuentemente por Ancylostomabraziliense. Presentamos el caso de una paciente de sexo femenino, de 18 años de edad, sin antecedentes epidemiológicos de viaje a zona endémica, con clínica característica asociada a manifestación bullosa atípica, que presentó remisión completa con el tratamientoinstaurado.
SUMMARY: Cutaneous larva migrans is an endemic parasitosis most commonly found in warm-humid areas, tipically of tropical and subtropical climates. Characterized by serpiginous and pruritic skin lesions, it is usually caused by Ancylostomabraziliense. We present the case of an 18 year-old female patient with no history of endemic exposure and atypical bullous clinical lesions. Full recovery is achieved after the treatment.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Patient satisfaction has become an increasingly important component of quality assessment. This cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the psychometric properties of a Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire modified for use in the Sickle Cell Unit, Jamaica. METHODS: A total of 85 persons were interviewed. Construct validity, including exploratory factor analysis and internal reliability were assessed. Data were analysed using SPSS (version 11.5 for Windows) and Intercooled STATA (version 8.2). RESULTS: The Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire modified for use in the Sickle Cell Unit demonstrated good internal reliability for the 'doctors', 'nurses', 'social worker' and 'facilities' subscales (Cronbach's a > 0.70). Exploratory factor analysis revealed only four of the seven 'specific' subscales retaining a single factor, namely the 'nurses', 'facilities', 'appointments'and 'social worker'subscales. Those who attended more frequently gave a statistically significant higher score for 'facilities' and lower score for 'nurses'. However there was no statistically significant difference in the mean scores by age, gender and genotype. The 'general satisfaction' subscale scores showed a significant positive correlation with scores for 'doctors', 'nurses', 'laboratory' and 'facilities' and 'appointments'. CONCLUSION: This preliminary report on the validation of the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire modified for use in the Sickle Cell Unit reveals it has the potential for serving as a useful tool in the assessment ofpatient satisfaction among sickle cell patients. However, further work is necessary on the instrument.
OBJETIVO: La satisfacción del paciente se ha convertido en un componente cada vez más importante de la evaluación de la calidad. Este estudio transversal se llevó a cabo a fin de evaluar las propiedades psicométricas de una Cuestionario de Satisfacción del Cliente, modificado para su uso en la Unidad de Anemia Falciforme, Jamaica. MÉTODOS: Se entrevistó un total de 85 personas. Se evaluó la validez del constructo, incluyendo el análisis exploratorio de factores y la confiabilidad interna. Los datos fueron analizados utilizando el SPSS (versión 11.5 para Windows) e Intercooled STATA (versión 8.2). RESULTADOS: El Cuestionario de Satisfacción del Cliente para uso en la Unidad de Anemia Falciforme demostró buena confiabilidad interna para las subescalas de 'doctores', 'enfermeras', 'trabajadores sociales'e 'instalaciones'(Cronbach: a > 0.70). El análisis exploratorio de factores reveló solamente cuatro de las siete subescalas "específicas" que retienen un solo factor, a saber, "enfermeras", "instalaciones ", "citas " y "trabajadores sociales ". Aquellos que asistían con mayor frecuencia, arrojaron - desde el punto de vista de las estadísticas - una puntuación significativamente más alta para las "instalaciones", y una puntuación más bajas para las "enfermeras ". Sin embargo, no hubo diferencias estadísticas significativas en las puntuaciones promedio por edad, género o genotipo. Las puntuaciones de subescala de la "satisfacción general" mostraron una correlación significativamente positiva con respecto a las puntuaciones para "doctores", "enfermeras", "laboratorio" e "instalaciones, y "citas". CONCLUSIÓN: Este reporte preliminar sobre la validación del Cuestionario de Satisfacción del Paciente, modificado para su uso en la Unidad de Anemia Falciforme, revela que esta Unidad tiene el potencial necesario para servir como instrumento útil a fin de evaluar el grado de satisfacción del servicio entre los pacientes de anemia falciforme. No obstante, el instrumento requiere ulterior elaboración.
Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Ambulatory Care Facilities/standards , Patient Satisfaction , Cross-Sectional Studies , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Jamaica , Psychometrics , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Surveys and Questionnaires , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
A postgraduate programme is developed to provide Family Medicine training to practising General Practitioners. The programme provides physicians with didactic material by distance education while enhancing clinical competence through face-to-face sessions in ambulatory clinics. Assessment of participating physicians is based on the responses to distance education assignments, case presentations during clinical sessions, clinical examinations at the end of year 2 and the defense of a research project in year 3. Initial programme evaluations demonstrate that the distance education format is successfully incorporated in the discipline of Family Medicine postgraduate training.