Risk factors of perioperative heart failure in elderly patients with femoral shaft fracture / 中国骨伤

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To study the risk factors of perioperative heart failure in the elderly patients with femoral shaft fracture by the regression analysis, so as to provide relevant clinical reference.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>From July 2012 to April 2017, 143 elderly patients with femoral shaft fracture who underwent surgical treatment in our hospital were retrospectively studied. Among them, 25 patients with perioperative heart failure included 10 males and 15 females with a mean age of (77.2±12.5) years old; 118 patients without heart failure included 54 males and 64 females with a mean age of (71.1±10.6) years old. The data of the time from injury to operation, hypertension history, heart disease history, disturbance of consciousness, preoperative renal function, operation method, operation time, anesthesia mode, perioperative fluid volume difference, perioperative pain score, postoperative hemoglobin were collected and recorded. The various factors of the two groups were compared, and a multiple factor Logistic regression analysis was performed on the meaningful results in order to identify the independent risk factors.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Univariate analysis showed that age, heart disease history, preoperative renal function and perioperative fluid volume had statistical difference between the two groups(<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that the independent risk factors of perioperative heart failure were age[=0.016,=2.789(1.208, 6.439)], heart disease history[=0.011,=2.878(1.269, 6.527)], preoperative renal function[=0.043,=2.410(1.027, 5.654)], the perioperative fluid volume difference[=0.022,=4.215(1.230, 14.439)].</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>The age, heart disease history, preoperative renal function and perioperative fluid balance are the risk factors of perioperative heart failure in elderly patients with femoral fracture. During the perioperative period, we should pay full attention to and evaluate the hazards of these risk factors and adopt effective and effective prevention and treatment measures.</p>

Case-control study on comprehensive traditional Chinese medicine therapy for preventing postsurgery stiffness after operation for terrible triad of the elbow / 中国骨伤

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To study therapeutic effects of comprehensive traditional Chinese medicine therapy for preventing postsurgery stiffness after operation for terrible triad of the elbow.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>From December 2008 to December 2013,32 patients with elbow triad were randomly divided into two groups: therapy group and control group. There were 17 patients in control group including 12 males and 5 females with a mean age of (41.0 ± 7.1) years old. The patients in control group were received the past procedure therapy. There were 15 patients in therapy group, including 10 males and 5 females with a mean age of (41.3 ± 7.6) years old. The patients in therapy group were received comprehensive traditional Chinese medicine therapy, including passive exercise training at early stage (0 to 2 weeks after operation), transition from passive to active exercise training at middle stage (3 to 4 weeks after operation), and active exercise training at late stage (5 to 12 weeks after operation). Other treatment methods, such as orally taking or externally use of Chinese herbal medicine, manipulation and physiotherapy, were used at all stages. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score, patient satisfaction and complications were evaluated and analyzed.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>All the patients were followed up, and the mean duration was 7.5 months. There were no complications such as internal fixation loosing, obvious displacement fracture and heterotopic ossification occurred. The Mayo score and patient satisfaction in therapy group were higher than those in control group (t = 12.78, P = 0.00; χ2 = 8.719, P = 0.003). Seven patients needed reoperation in control group, compared with 1 patient in therapy group (χ2 = 4.626, P = 0.032).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The comprehensive traditional Chinese medicine therapy is effective to prevent postoperative stiffness after operation for terrible triad of the elbow by using different methods at different stages, which is worthy of spread and application.</p>

Progress of diagnosis and treatment in deltoid ligament injuries of ankle / 中国骨伤

Deltoid ligament injury is common in the daily activities, unlike some other diseases, mechanism of deltoid ligament injury is relatively clear with less controversies, but the consistent standard for its diagnosis and treatment has not yet formed. Whether the stress X-ray as the main basis for diagnosis, MRI check for early application, and the indications of surgical exploration and so on, these are not unified. In the international, especially the conservative treatment and surgical treatment has been existing two major differences. In the choice of surgical treatment, domestic and foreign experts have respective preference. In recent years, domestic researchers emphasis to repair with suture anchors, while abroad it has been mainly to reconstruct the deltoid ligament.

Case-control study on combined therapy for preventing postsurgery stiffness after elbow fracture / 中国骨伤

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To research the efficacy,security and necessity of combined therapy for preventing postsurgery stiffness after elbow fracture.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>From May 2009 to April 2010, 60 patients with elbow fractures treated by operation were randomly divided into two groups: combined therapy group and past procedure group. Thirty patients in the combined therapy group,including 12 males and 18 females, ranging in age from 23 to 63 years, averaged (43.53 +/- 7.74) years old; 15 patients had two parts fractures, including humeral intercondylar fractures combined with olecroanon and (or) ulna coronoid process fractures in 8 cases, fractures of exterior and interior humeral condyle combined with capitulum radius in 3 cases, fractures of olecroanon and ulna coronoid process in 3 cases, fractures of olecroanon and capitulum radius in 1 case; other 15 patients had one part fractures, including fractures of exterior or interior humeral condyle in 8 cases,fractures of olecroanon or ulna coronoid process in 6 cases, fractures of capitulum radius in 1 patient. Thirty patients in the past procedure group,including 11 males and 19 females, ranging in age from 24 to 67 years, averaged (46.13 +/- 6.22) years; 15 patients had two parts fractures, including fractures of humeral intercondylar fracture combined with olecroanon and(or) ulna coronoid process in 7 cases, fractures of exterior and interior humeral condyle combined with capitulum radius in 2 cases,fractures of olecroanon and ulna coronoid process in 5 cases,fractures of humeral intercondylar fracture combined with capitulum radius in 1 patient; 15 pa- tients had one part fracture, including fractures of exterior or interior humeral condyle in 6 cases, fractures of olecroanon or ulna coronoid process in 8 cases, fractures of capitulum radius in 1 patient; the patients in the past procedure group were treated with past procedure methods. Mayo Elbow Performance Score (including gmotion of elbow joint) and security (using X-ray to recheck displacement fracture, internal fixation failure and heterotopic ossification) were evaluated at postoperative 6 months. From 2002 to 2006, 30 patients were reviewed as historical control group, including 17 males and 13 females, ranging in age from 27 to 62 years, averaged (47.17 +/- 7.83) years; 15 patients had two parts fractures, including fractures of humeral intercondylar combined with olecroanon and(or) ulna coronoid process in 7 cases, fractures of exterior and interior humeral condyle combined with capitulum radius in 1 case, fractures of olecroanon and ulna coronoid process in 6 cases, fractures of ulna coronoid process and capitulum radius in 1 case; 15 patients had one part fractures,including fractures of exterior or interior humeral condyle in 9 cases, fractures of olecroanon or ulna coronoid process in 5 cases,fractures of capitulum radius in 1 case. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score of the patients in historical control group was evaluated retrospectively at postoperative 6 months and the results were compared with that of past procedure group.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Mayo score of combined therapy group was (91.00 +/- 7.81)surpassed to (76.83 +/- 10.71) of the past procedure group and (73.17 +/- 1.99) of historical control group (F = 24.98, P < 0.05). The range of motion of elbow was (102.40 +/- 9.16) degrees of combined therapy group surpassed to (83.57 +/- 6.21) degrees of the past procedure group (t = 9.325, P < 0.05). There were no internal fixation loose,obvious fracture displacement and heterotopic ossification in each X-ray examination of patients in the combined therapy group. The Mayo score of historical control group was (73.17 +/- 11.99), showing no significant differences when compared with (76.83 +/- 10.71) of the past procedure group (LSD, P = 0.172).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Combined therapy including different stage, different method combination and different subject to practice to prevent postsurgery stiffness after elbow fracture is effect, security and necessity.</p>

Case-control study on the reconstruction of near distal tendo achillis rupture by suture anchors and traditional steel wire / 中国骨伤

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compare the curative effects of newly suture anchors and traditional steel wire for the reconstruction of near distal tendo achillis rupture.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>The clinical data of 56 patients with near distal tendo achillis rupture from June 2007 to February 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. Among 31 patients receiving reconstruction by suture anchors, 22 patients were male and 9 patients were female, with a mean age of 35.5 years (ranging from 16 to 52 years ). Among 25 patients treated with traditional steel wire, 19 patients were male and 6 patients were female, with a mean age of 37.6 years (ranging from 22 to 53 years). The different rehabilitation was conducted for every patient at different times after operation. The position of suture anchor and steel wire were recorded. The clinical data such as operative time, complications of the surgery and the function of stendo achillis were analyzed. The healing of stendo achillis and functional recovery were assessed by Arner-Lindholm standard.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>All the patients were followed up with an average during of 24.2 months. There were no intraoperative injuries on blood vessels, nerve and tendon. The average operative time and postoperative complications of suture anchors were lower than there of the traditional steel wire (t = 8.75, P = 0.00; Chi2 = 5.42, P = 0.02). The functional recovery of tendo achillis repaired by suture anchors was better than that in the group of traditional steel wire (Chi2 = 7.65, P = 0.02).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Compared to the traditional steel wire, suture anchor demonstrate the superior performance on repairing rupture of the near distal tendo achillis, which is a reliable and effective treatment methods.</p>