ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the impact of accelerator′s multi-leaf collimator (MLC) on the radiotherapy dose with different gantry angles.Methods Measured with Mapcheck 2D diode array and 30 cm×30 cm×3 cm solid water, Pre-selecting the 30 appropriate single fields and 0°,45°,90°,270°,315° gantry angles of static and dynamic intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), quantification analysis of the passing rate with MapCheck γ(3%/3 mm) and (5%/3 mm) analysis methods, and the same method to 30 examples static and dynamic IMRT plans.Results When the accelerator collimator angle is 0°,the 30 appropriate single fields′ passing rate of between 0°gantry angle and 45°,90°,270°,315°gantry angles of static and dynamic IMRT accordingly is 97.71% and 96.25%(t=1.70, P=0.389), 96.34% and 93.72%(t=2.95, P=0.002), 96.65% and 92.98%(t=2.87, P=0.005), 95.87% and 93.15%(t=2.71, P=0.006), 96.09% and 93.51%(t=2.89, P=0.004) with MapCheck γ(3%/3 mm) analysis methods, however, the passing rate also does not have the difference, respectively is 99.31%-99.73% and 98.89-99.68%(t=0.57-1.90, P=0.913-0.725) with MapCheck γ(5%/3 mm) analysis methods;the passing rate of 30 examples static and dynamic IMRT plans accordingly is 96.11%-96.76% and 94.88%-95.78%(t=1.02-1.61, P=0.317-0.235).Conclusions When the accelerator collimator angle is 0°, at different gantry angles, MLC leaves due to gravity, friction, inertia, etc caused by errors in place, the physical penumbra and leakage radiation will indeed affect the IMRT dose, however, the deviation of dose distribution is within acceptable 5%.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explorer the application in detection the position accuracy of the multileaf collimator of Varian accelerator with dynamic therapy log files. Methods A pre-designed MLC format files named PMLC for two Varian accelerators, the dynamic treatment log files were recorded 10 times on a different date, and be converted into the MLC format files named DMLC, compared with the original plan PMLC, so we can analysis two files for each leaf position deviation. In addition, we analysis the repeatability of MLC leaves position accuracy between 10 dynalog files of two accelerators. Results No statistically significant difference between the average position of the 10 times leaf position of the two accelerators,their were 0. 29 -0. 29 and 0. 29 -0. 30(z = -0. 77, P=0. 442). About 40% ,30% ,20% and 10% of the leaf position deviation was at ≤0. 2 mm, 0. 3 mm,0. 5 mm and 0. 4 mm,respectively. the maximum value was 0. 5 mm. More than 86% of the leaf position are completely coincident between 10 dynamic treatment files of two accelerators,The rate of position deviation no more 0. 05 mm was 96. 6% and 97.3%, respectively.And the maximum value was 0. 09 mm. Conclusions Dynamic treatment log file is a splendid tool in testing the actual position of multi-leaf collimator. The multi-leaf collimator of two accelerators be detected are precise and stabilized.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To explore the position change of the setup reference markers on the sternum due to the change of hands grip position. Methods: Six hands grip positions were simulated for 8 patients and the set-up reference points marked on the sternum skin were compared while the hands grasped different positions of the hands. Results: The setup markers on the sternum were deviated by all five hands grip positions. The maximum deviated distance was 14mm. Conclusion: The change of the hands grip position can affect the position of setup reference markers on the sternum of the patients and thus the isocenter of plan may be aligned to the wrong area.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the results of CT/MRI registration by using two different marker materials. Methods CT and MR transversal images (using electric wire and thin tube filled with lohexol injection as matching points respectively) were obtained from nine cases with brain tumor. Another CT and MR transversal images were also obtained by using the cod-liver oil capsule filled with gadopentetate dimeglumine injection as matching points with the same scanning position. The images were transferred to the TPS for image registration and the effect was evaluated. Results The CT/MRI CRE range for using different kinds of marker material was 0.16-0.28cm,while was 0.06-0.16cm for using the same marker material. Conclusion Comparing with the method using different kinds of material,the method using the same spherical material can get better results in CT/MRI registration.