ABSTRACT
Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids ( PPH) for treatment of rectal mucosa prolapse.Methods The 100 patients who suffered from rectal mucosa prolapse and were planning to take surgical treatment for the first time in our hospital from June 2013 to June 2015 were randomly divided into the treatment group and the control group .Patients in the treatment group(n=50) underwent PPH while patients in the control group (n=50) underwent traditional simplified mucosal plication technique .To observe the therapeutic effect of the two groups ,the average operation time ,average length of stay in hospital ,postoperative pain within 72 hours,postoperative anal function and postoperative complications of the two groups .Results There was no significant difference in the over-all treatment effect between the two groups(P>0.05).The average operation time, average length of stay in hospital,postoperative pain with-in 72 hours and postoperative anal function of the treatment group were lower than those of the control group ,and the differences were significant (P0.05).Conclusion Compare to the traditional simplified mucosal plication technique ,PPH technique has more advantages such as shorter operation time ,less anguish of patients,less complication,shorter hospitalization time,and higher security, which indicates PPH could become the preferred method for treatment of rectal mucosa prolapse .