Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy ; (12): 377-378, 2008.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-401300

ABSTRACT

Objective Compare the difference on vision,vision field between treating on central retinal artery with compound anisodine retrobulbar injection associate with emporat artery side injection and emporal artery side injection simply.Estimate the curative effect of the two ways on the disease.Methods Observe the patients'vision,vison field and cross-check,analyze the results who have central retinal artery and there are 20 who treated by compound anisodine retrobulbar injection associate with emporal artery side injection together with 20 who treated by emporal artery side injection purely.Results The therapeutics that is compound anisodine retrobulbar injection associate with emporal artery side injection is excellence to 10,effective to 6 and ineffective to 4;the therapeutics that is arter3,side injection purely is excellence to 5,effective to 5 and ineffective to 10.The two therapeuticses has significant difference on improving vision and ameliorating vision field.Conclusion It's quite effective to treat central retinal artery occlusion by compound anisodine retrobulbar injection associate with emporal artery side injection.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL