Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy ; (12): 2741-2743, 2011.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-421986

ABSTRACT

ObjectiveTo explore the efficacy of sevoflurane or propofol combined with remifentanil during the maintenance of general anesthesia in thyroid gland surgery.MethodsSixty patients underwent thyroid gland surgery were randomly divided into tow groups.Once the larynx mask was intubated, anesthesia was maintained with propofol(the effect site concentration was 2.5 ~3.5mg/L) and remifentanil(the effect site concentration was 4.5 ~5.5μg/L) by TCI technique in group P,but with sevoflurane(2%~4%) and remfentanil(the effect site concentration was 2.5 ~4.0g/L)in group S.The depth of anesthesia was measured by the A-line TM AEP Monitor which expressed as A-Line ARX Index TM(AAI).All patients' SBP,DBP and HR were recorded at eight time points: before induction time(T0) ,after induction but before larynx mask intubation time(T1) ,intubate larynx mask time(T2) ,cut skin time (T3), separate thyroid gland time (T4), cut thyroid gland time (T5), remove larynx mask time (T6) ,leave the operation room time(T7).The emergency time,the conscious of the patients after anesthesia and the side effects were also recorded.ResultsThere were no significant differences between the groups with respect to age,gender,weight,the duration of operation,the emergency time and the conscious of the patients after anesthesia.SBP,DBP,HR of the patients in both groups showed no significant difference at T0,T1 ,T2, T3 (all P > 0.05), but had significant difference at T4,T5,T6, T7 (all P < 0.05).Compare with group P,the incidentce of restlessness, dizziness, drowsiness, rigor and pain was significantly lower in group S(all P <0.05).The incidentce of nausea,vomit and aspiration did not appear in both groups.ConclusionBoth groups showed good anesthesia effects and the patients also emerged from anesthesia quickly.But the anesthesia maintained with sevoflurane and remifentanil could bring more stable hemodynamics and lower incidence rate of the side effects.

2.
Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology ; (12): 276-278, 2010.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-390089

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare the effects of patient's tolerance to laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and tracheal tube (TT) on the appropriate level of sevoflurane anesthesia.Methods Eighty ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱ patients aged 30-60 yr weighing 50-70 kg undergoing elective thyroid or breast surgery were randomly divided into 2 groups (n=40 each):LMA group and TT group.Anesthesia wag induced with propofol 1.6mg/kg,fentanyl 3μg/kg and recuronium 0.6mg/kg.LMA or tracheal tube was inserted,and the patients were mechanically ventilated.Anesthesia was maintained with inhalation of 1.5%-3.0% sevoflurane and 50% N2O in O2 in group LMA,and with 2.5%-5.0% sevoflurane and 50% N2O in O2 in group TT.The flow of O2 and N2O was 0.7-1.0L/min,and the concentration of sevofluranee was adjusted to maintain AAI at 15-25.ECG,HR,MAP,SpO2,PETCO2,AEP and end-tidal sevoflurane concentration were continuonsly monitored.The end-tidal sevoflurane concentration was recorded at 1,5 and 10 min after LMA/TT was placed (T1-3),at 1h after skin incision (T4) and at the end of operation before removal of LMA or extubation (T5).The recovery time of consciousness,adverse cardiovascular events and adverse reactions were recorded.Results The end-tidal sevoflurane concentration was significantly lower,the recovery time of consciousness and removal of LMA or extubation time were shorter,and the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events and adverse reactions was lower in LMA group than in TT group.Conclusion At the same depth of anesthesia (AAI 15-25),sevoflurane concentration is significantly lower in LMA group than in TT group,with fewer complications and smaller cardiovascular reaction.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL