ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the function of ERCC2/XPD polymorphisms in the repair of DNA damage induced by UVC. Methods Plas?mids stably expressing ERCC2/XPD rs13181 AA(Lys751)and ERCC2/XPD rs13181 CC(Gln751)were transfected into Chinese hamster ovary cells,and the stable ERCC2 transfected cell lines were obtained. MTT assay was used to compare the inhibitory rates of the transfected cells treated with UVC at different irradiation intensity. The DNA damage repair ability of the transfected cells treated with UVC for 1,3,6 and 24 h was detected by modified comet assay. Results Compared with UV5ERCC2(CC),UV5ERCC2(CC) was more sensitive to UVC with decreased cell viability. DNA damage level of UV5ERCC2(CC) cells was more serious than UV5ERCC2(CC). Conclusion DNA repair capacity of ERCC2/XPD rs13181A allelic is lower than its wild?type,suggesting that ERCC2/XPDpolymorphisms play a critical role in UVC?induced DNA damage repair.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the effect of intra-aortic balloon pumping(IABP)in treating serious coronary heart disease. MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed on 19 patients who suffered from serious coronary heart disease and accepted IABP therapy,the differences of mean arterial pressure before and after treatment were compared.In order to compare the in-hospital mortality,the patients were divided into 2 groups:6 of 19 patients accepted single IABP therapy,13 of 19 patients attempted IABP and revascularization(thrombolytic/percutaneous coronary intervention/coronary artery bypass graft)therapy. ResultsBedside success rate of IABP operation was 100%without complication.Effective rate was 89.5%(17/19),2 patients who were irreversible phase of cardiogenic shock,were an ineffective treatment.The patient's mean arterial pressure increased from(52.1 ± 18.4)mm Hg to(78.3 20.8)mm Hg after using IA BP for 30 minutes(P＜0.01).The in-hospital mortality was significantly lower in patients received revascularization therapy in addition to IABP compared with patients who had IABP support alone 7.7% vs 83.3%(P＜0.01). ConclusionIABP in treating serious coronary heart disease was safe and effective.IABP treatment before irreversible phase of shock and revascularization therapy following IABP are the key to decrease in-hospital mortality.