Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics ; : 237-245, 2021.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-903471

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE@#This study aimed to compare the microshear bond strength (µSBS) of dual-cure resin cement in CAD-CAM zirconia after different cleaning techniques. @*MATERIALS AND METHODS@#Fifty discs of zirconia-based ceramic from Ivoclar Vivadent were embedded in acrylic resin. The discs were divided into five groups according to the cleaning @*methods@#used: Group 1: drying with spraying + sandblasting with Al2O3 ; Group 2: washed with water and dried with spraying + sandblasting with Al2O 3 ; Group 3: washed with distilled water and dried with spraying + sandblasting with Al2O3 + zirconium oxide (Ivoclean); Group 4: washed with distilled water and dried with spraying + sandblasting with Al2O3 + potassium hydroxide (Zirclean); and Group 5: washed with distilled water and dried with spraying + sandblasting with Al2O3 + 1% NaClO. All of the groups were contaminated with artificial saliva for 1 minute and then cleaned. Statistical analyses were performed using ANOVA and Tukey’s tests. @*RESULTS@#There were statistically significant differences among all groups for µSBS (P < .05). The group treated with zirconium oxide (Group 3) showed the highest µSBS (18.75 ± 0.23 MPa). @*CONCLUSION@#When applied to zirconia, the cleaning methods affected the bonding with resin cement differently.

2.
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics ; : 237-245, 2021.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-895767

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE@#This study aimed to compare the microshear bond strength (µSBS) of dual-cure resin cement in CAD-CAM zirconia after different cleaning techniques. @*MATERIALS AND METHODS@#Fifty discs of zirconia-based ceramic from Ivoclar Vivadent were embedded in acrylic resin. The discs were divided into five groups according to the cleaning @*methods@#used: Group 1: drying with spraying + sandblasting with Al2O3 ; Group 2: washed with water and dried with spraying + sandblasting with Al2O 3 ; Group 3: washed with distilled water and dried with spraying + sandblasting with Al2O3 + zirconium oxide (Ivoclean); Group 4: washed with distilled water and dried with spraying + sandblasting with Al2O3 + potassium hydroxide (Zirclean); and Group 5: washed with distilled water and dried with spraying + sandblasting with Al2O3 + 1% NaClO. All of the groups were contaminated with artificial saliva for 1 minute and then cleaned. Statistical analyses were performed using ANOVA and Tukey’s tests. @*RESULTS@#There were statistically significant differences among all groups for µSBS (P < .05). The group treated with zirconium oxide (Group 3) showed the highest µSBS (18.75 ± 0.23 MPa). @*CONCLUSION@#When applied to zirconia, the cleaning methods affected the bonding with resin cement differently.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL