Quality of life in reflux and dyspepsia [QOLRAD] questionnaire in Iranian patients with GERD: a validation study

Symptoms of gastro-esophageal reflux disease [GERD] affect health-related quality of life [HRQOL]. When a questionnaire is translated into a new language, linguistic validation is necessary, yet insufficient, unless the psychometric characteristics have been verified. The aim of this study is to document the translation and psychometric validation of the Persian translation of the Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia [QOLRAD] questionnaire. After translation and cultural adaptation of QOLRAD to Persian, fifty patients with clinical GERD from the Prospective Acid Reflux Study of Iran [PARSI] database who had at least one of the symptoms of acid regurgitation, heartburn, non-cardiac chest pain, or dysphagia for at least four weeks over the past three months completed the QOLRAD and Short Form Health Survey-36 [SF-36]. After two weeks, QOLRAD was again completed by the patients. Cronbach alpha and Intra-class Correlation Coefficient [ICC] were used to test reliability and Pearson correlation was used to compare the dimensions of SF-36 and QOLRAD. The translation was approved by MAPI Research Institute. Fifty patients completed the SF-36 and QOLRAD questionnaires at the first visit. Mean [SD] age of the participants was 38.4 [14.6] years and 68% were females. The internal consistency and reliability of QOLRAD ranged from 0.78-0.92. The test-retest reliability of QOLRAD was from 0.87-0.93. Relevant QOLRAD domains significantly correlated with the majority of SF-36 domains, with the exception of sleep disturbance. The psychometric characteristics of the Persian translation of QOLRAD were found to be good, with satisfactory reliability and validity

Assessment of inter-and intra-observer variability of the la classification for gerd

Los Angeles classification is widely adopted as a means of unifying endoscopic observation for GERD. We assessed the inter- and intra-observer variability of LA classification. Two-hundred fifty-four still images of the lower esophagus taken by an expert endoscopist [RM] were randomly selected and presented to 9 gastroenterologists [2 females, 6 experts, 3 trainees]. They were asked to report the images according to LA classification. After 2 weeks the images were re-ordered and the same people were asked to report them again. Kappa-statistics was calculated for intra- and inter-observer variability. Mean kappa for intra-observer agreement was 0.54 for experts and 0.55 for trainees [p = NS]. Mean intra-observer kappa was greater among females than males [0.70 vs 0.50 respectively, p=0.05]. Mean inter-observer kappa was 0.20 and 0.31 for experts and trainees respectively [p = NS]. Mean inter-observer weighted kappas were 0.25 and 0.07 [p = 0.007] for males and females respectively. Analyzing data for source of the discrepancy showed that the least reproducible reading was GERD-A both for intra- and inter-observer agreement calculations. According to our data, the LA classification, although a major advance in reporting GERD, has a poor to fair reproducibility. There was no difference between experts and trainees in using the LA classification. Females seem to be more consistent in their readings, but have less agreement with others. Despite the inherent short-comings of kappa statistics and the limitation caused by the possible quality of the still images, revision of the LA system seems to be advisable