Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Journal of Kerman University of Medical Sciences. 2010; 17 (1): 1-9
in Persian | IMEMR | ID: emr-197316

ABSTRACT

Background and Aims: Liver ischemia-reperfusion [IR] is one of the common consequences of liver surgery, especially during liver transplantation which results in organ dysfunction. Acute hepatic injury causes systematic inflammatory responses which may finally lead to functional disturbances in remote organs such as heart, lungs and kidneys. In this study, the effects of a potent inhibitor of inflammatory cytokines [pentoxyfilline, PTX] and a well known antioxidant, [N-acetylcysteine, NAC], was evaluated on renal functional damage and oxidative stress following liver IR


Method: Five groups of six male rats were used. Group one was sham operated. In group 2, 90 min liver partial ischemia was conducted by a clamp around hepatic artery and portal vein and followed by 4 hours of reperfusion. In group 3 and 4, PTX or NAC was injected intraperitoneally before the ischemia, while in group 5 both drugs were co-administered. The levels of ALT, AST, ALP, BUN and creatinine in serum as well as MDA and GSH levels in renal tissues were measured


Results: Significant increase in the serum levels of ALT, AST in IR group is indicative of liver functional damages comparing to sham operated rats. Elevated BUN levels and increased renal tissue MDA and decreased GSH levels in IR group demonstrates a significant kidney functional damage and oxidative stress comparing to sham group. Administration of PTX alone and PTX+NAC prevented the IR-induced increase in renal MDA levels. Administration of both drugs and their co-administration prevented the reduction in renal GSH levels


Conclusion: Pretreatment with PTX and NAC before liver IR induction may prevent renal oxidative stress by protection of cellular GSH concentration and a reduction in MDA levels

2.
Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. 2007; 18 (63): 1-10
in Persian | IMEMR | ID: emr-83513

ABSTRACT

Thyroid dysfunctions are one of the most important diseases in endocrinology. Fine needle aspiration [FNA] is currently the first line diagnostic tool for the evaluation of thyroid nodules. The adequacy of specimens provided by this method is also very important. FNA puncture in thyroid causes intra- parenchyma hemorrhage, which may distribute the quality of tissue specimens. Fine needle non-aspiration [FNNA], may provide better specimens without this problem. The aim of this study was to evaluate the adequacy of thyroid nodules specimens provided by fine needle aspiration and fine needle non - aspiration sampling in Imam Hospital. This descriptive study was performed on 200 patients with thyroid nodules in Imam Hospital, Sari, Iran. After a detailed clinical history, systemic examination and thyroid sonography, FNA and FNNA sampling were performed in all patients. The adequacy of specimens was evaluated by Mair scoring system in both techniques. All data, including demographic data and sonographic results and background blood, amount of cellular material, degree of cellular degeneration, degree of cellular trauma and retention of appropriate architecture were recorded. Results were analyzed by means of SPSS [11] software and Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test. The P.value less than 0.05 were considered to be significant statistically. 200 patients, 189 [94.5%] females and 11 [5.5%] males, with mean age of 43.36 +/- 12.3 years were studied. Cytological findings showed that in FNA technique, 26[13%] of specimens were unsuitable for diagnosis, 97[48.5%] were diagnostic/adequate, while 77[38.5%] were diagnostic/superior for diagnosis. In FNNA technique, 32[16%] of specimens were unsuitable, 96 [48%] were diagnostic/ adequate, while 72 [36%] were diagnostic/superior for diagnosis. In the combined application of FNA and FNNA, 9 [4.5%] of specimens were not diagnostible and 191 [95.5%] were diagnostic. Mean of total score in FNA was 5.82 +/- 2.3, while in FNNA was 5.70 +/- 2.4, with the difference was not statistically significant. Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference between other parameters. Our study demonstrates that there is no difference between FNA and FNNA sampling, however, applying the combination of these two techniques, may improve the diagnostic quality


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Specimen Handling , Thyroid Nodule , Cytological Techniques
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL