Risk predictors for adverse outcome in pediatric febrile neutropenia: Single center experience from a low and middle‑income country.

BACKGROUND: Risk stratification of patients with febrile neutropenia (FN) into those at “High Risk” and “Low Risk” of developing complications helps in making decisions regarding optimal treatment, such as whether to treat with oral or intravenous antibiotics, whether to treat as inpatient or outpatient and how long to treat. Risk predictors obtained from Western studies on pediatric FN are unlikely to be relevant to low middle‑income country (LMICs). Our study aimed to identify clinical and laboratory parameters predictive of poor outcomes in children with chemotherapy‑induced FN in a LMIC. PROCEDURE: Two hundred and fifty consecutive episodes of chemotherapy‑induced FN in pediatric (<15 years) patients were analyzed prospectively. Adverse outcomes were defined as per SPOG 2003 FN study as serious medical complications (SMC) due to infection, microbiologically defined infection, and radiologically defined pneumonia (RDP). Variables found to be significant for adverse outcome (P < 0.05) on univariate analysis were selected for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Five factors that were found to independently predict adverse outcome were (a) previously documented infection in the past 6 months, (b) presence of significant focus of infection, (c) absolute phagocyte count <100/mm3, (d) peak temperature more than 39°C in this episode of FN, and (e) fever lasting more than 5 days during this episode of FN. CONCLUSIONS: Identifying the risk factors for adverse outcome in pediatric FN, which are objective and applicable across LMICs would contribute in developing guidelines for the management of FN in a resource‑limited setting.

Pathological complete response in locally advanced breast cancer: Determinants and predictive significance.

Background. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is now the standard approach for most large breast cancers including locally advanced cancers of the breast. The majority of patients respond satisfactorily to chemotherapy with effective downsizing of tumours to consider breast conservation surgery. Pathological complete response (pathCR) is known to be a strong predictor of good outcome; however, many factors are known to influence the extent of response to chemotherapy. It has been observed that smaller the tumour, better is the response achieved in contrast to larger and locally advanced tumours where only one-third may respond well enough to merit breast conservation. Various other clinical, biological and molecular factors are also being evaluated as effective predictors of chemosensitivity. Most of these are either not easily available for all patients in developing countries or are overtly expensive and not applicable for all patients. Methods. We evaluated the clinical and pathological predictors of response to chemotherapy in 1402 women with locally advanced breast cancer. Results. There was a higher rate of pathCR in smaller tumours, younger women and ER-negative as well as triple negative tumours. The presence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and lymphatic and vascular invasion (LVI) were associated with lower pathCR. Conclusion. In the absence of ready availability of expensive molecular and genomic assays, clinical parameters and standard histopathological variables can also be useful indicators of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Additionally, they can help identify those who could be eventually conserved or have a better outcome.

Estrogen, progesterone and HER2 receptor expression in breast tumors of patients, and their usage of HER2-targeted therapy, in a tertiary care centre in India.

Background: This study was undertaken to document the pattern of expression of estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) and the usage of HER2-targeted therapy in a large tertiary care hospital in India in the year 2008. Materials and Methods: The histopathology reports of all breast cancer patients registered in the hospital in 2008 were extracted from the electronic medical record system. All the cases were immunohistochemically evaluated for estrogen and progesterone receptor status (ER and PR), and c-erbB-2 protein (HER2) expression using standard immunoperoxidase method. The use of HER2-targeted therapies was evaluated by extracting relevant information from the database of the hospital pharmacy and case charts of patients enrolled in ongoing approved trials. Results: A total of 2001 new patients of invasive breast cancers with available pathology reports were registered in the hospital in the year 2008. ER and/or PR expression was positive in tumors of 1025 (51.2%) patients. HER2 3+ expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) was found in 335 (16.7%) and HER2 2+ in 163 (8.1%). The triple negative phenotype was found in 596 (29.8%) patients. An estimated 441 patients were eligible to receive HER2-targeted therapy based on their HER2 status. Of these 38 (8.6%) patients received some form of HER2-targeted therapy; 20 patients (4.5%) as part of ongoing clinical trials and 18 (4.1%) as part of routine care. Conclusions: The overwhelming majority of patients eligible for HER2-targeted therapy in our institution are unable to receive it because of financial constraints and limited access to health insurance. There is a higher fraction of patients with the triple negative phenotype compared to the Western population.

Low axillary sampling in clinically node-negative operable breast cancer.

Background. Targeted sentinel node biopsy has been extensively validated. It has been incorporated into standard guidelines for axillary prediction in women with clinically node-negative operable breast cancer. However, the high cost of the gamma probe and the need for radiocolloid have limited its widespread acceptance in developing countries. We aimed to validate low axillary sampling as a reliable alternative method to sentinel node biopsy in a developing country. Methods. An anatomically guided low axillary sampling removes the lower level I axillary fat with lymph nodes and the method was validated by completing axillary clearance in all women. Results. Three hundred fifty-five women with clinically node-negative operable breast cancer underwent validation of low axillary sampling, with lymph nodes identified in all of them. The median number of nodes identified in low axillary sampling was 5 with overall node-positivity of 32.1% (114 of 355). Ten of these 114 patients were wrongly identified as node-negative by the sampled lymph nodes, i.e. a false-negative rate of 8.8%. Further exploratory analysis showed that 6-node low axillary sampling gave an excellent false-negative rate of 1.5% with 95% sensitivity, which was comparable with the highly targeted sentinel node biopsy technique. Conclusions. With an overall false-negative rate of 8.8% with 5-node low axillary sampling, and even better falsenegative rate of 1.5% with 6-node low axillary sampling, axillary sampling is a low-cost technology, which is a reliable alternative to sentinel node biopsy for axillary nodal prediction in clinically node-negative breast cancer.

Quality of life of head and neck cancer patient: validation of the European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30 and European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-H&N 35 in Indian patients.

AIMS: To present the first cross-culture validation of the European organization for research and treatment of cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaires, the EORTC-QLQ-C30, and the QLQ-H&N 35 in India. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: These questionnaires were translated into two vernacular languages and pilot test was done on 15 patients. Two hundred head and neck cancer patients completed the QLQ-C30 and the QLQ-H&N 35 at two time points during their treatment. Psychometric evaluation of the structure, reliability, and validity of the questionnaire was undertaken. RESULTS: The data supports the reliability of the scales. Validity was tested by item-scale, scale--scale correlation and by performing known group comparisons. The results demonstrated that the items correlated with their respective scale and no significant correlation was found between scales. The questionnaire was responsive to change over a period of time. SUMMARY: This data suggests that the EORTC QLO-C30 and the QLQ-H&N 35 are reliable and valid questionnaires when applied to a sample of head and neck cancer patients in India.

Validation of EORTC quality-of-life questionnaire in Indian women with operable breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) module QLQ-C30 and the breast cancer-specific module BR-23 have been validated worldwide to assess the quality of life (QOL) in women with breast cancer. No such study has been published on Indian women using EORTC questionnaires. METHODS: QOL was assessed in relation to surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy, radiation therapy and hormone therapy in 299 Indian women with operable breast cancer (OBC) at the Breast Unit of Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Mumbai, from October 1998 to September 2001. The QLQ-C30 module was used to assess physical health, emotional, cognitive and social functioning, and the BR-23 module to assess breast cancer treatment-related symptoms. Assessment was done at 3 visits: visit 1 (after surgery); visit 2 (during adjuvant therapy) and visit 3 (on completion of adjuvant therapy). RESULTS: Of the 299 women at first visit, 274 (91.6%) completed the visit 2 questionnaire and 239 (80%) completed the visit 3 questionnaire. Only those women who filled the questionnaires at all 3 visits were included as 'valid visits' for analysis (193 of 299; 64.5%). The reliability and validity of the English and translated versions of the questionnaires were tested by Cronbach alpha (0.61-0.96) and item-scale correlation (0.63-0.93). Women with breast conservation treatment had a superior body image as compared to those with mastectomy (p <0.001). Physical, emotional and cognitive functions were not related to the type of surgery. Global QOL, physical, sexual and role functioning were found to deteriorate with chemotherapy (p < or = 0.01). Radiotherapy had only local adverse effects (p < 0.001 ), while hormone therapy had no adverse impact on QOL. CONCLUSION: QLQ-C30 and BR-23 questionnaires can be used reliably to assess QOL in Indian patients. The translated versions were found to be valid for further use in clinical trials on Indian women with breast cancer.