Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz ; 107(supl.1): 112-123, Dec. 2012. ilus, graf, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-659749

ABSTRACT

Silent transmission of Mycobacterium leprae, as evidenced by stable leprosy incidence rates in various countries, remains a health challenge despite the implementation of multidrug therapy worldwide. Therefore, the development of tools for the early diagnosis of M. leprae infection should be emphasised in leprosy research. As part of the continuing effort to identify antigens that have diagnostic potential, unique M. leprae peptides derived from predicted virulence-associated proteins (group IV.A) were identified using advanced genome pattern programs and bioinformatics. Based on human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-binding motifs, we selected 21 peptides that were predicted to be promiscuous HLA-class I T-cell epitopes and eight peptides that were predicted to be HLA-class II restricted T-cell epitopes for field-testing in Brazil, Ethiopia and Nepal. High levels of interferon (IFN)-γ were induced when peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from tuberculoid/borderline tuberculoid leprosy patients located in Brazil and Ethiopia were stimulated with the ML2055 p35 peptide. PBMCs that were isolated from healthy endemic controls living in areas with high leprosy prevalence (EChigh) in Ethiopia also responded to the ML2055 p35 peptide. The Brazilian EChigh group recognised the ML1358 p20 and ML1358 p24 peptides. None of the peptides were recognised by PBMCs from healthy controls living in non-endemic region. In Nepal, mixtures of these peptides induced the production of IFN-γ by the PBMCs of leprosy patients and EChigh. Therefore, the M. leprae virulence-associated peptides identified in this study may be useful for identifying exposure to M. leprae in population with differing HLA polymorphisms.


Subject(s)
Humans , Cytokines/immunology , Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte/immunology , Mycobacterium leprae/pathogenicity , Virulence/immunology , Brazil , Bacterial Proteins/immunology , Computational Biology , Epitope Mapping , Ethiopia , Mycobacterium leprae/immunology , Mycobacterium leprae/isolation & purification , Mycobacterium leprae/virology , Nepal , Peptide Fragments/immunology , Recombinant Proteins/immunology
2.
Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz ; 107(supl.1): 124-131, Dec. 2012. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-659750

ABSTRACT

The diagnosis of leprosy continues to be based on clinical symptoms and early diagnosis and treatment are critical to preventing disability and transmission. Sensitive and specific laboratory tests are not available for diagnosing leprosy. Despite the limited applicability of anti-phenolic glycolipid-I (PGL-I) serology for diagnosis, it has been suggested as an additional tool to classify leprosy patients (LPs) for treatment purposes. Two formats of rapid tests to detect anti-PGL-I antibodies [ML immunochromatography assay (ICA) and ML Flow] were compared in different groups, multibacillary patients, paucibacillary patients, household contacts and healthy controls in Brazil and Nepal. High ML Flow intra-test concordance was observed and low to moderate agreement between the results of ML ICA and ML Flow tests on the serum of LPs was observed. LPs were "seroclassified" according to the results of these tests and the seroclassification was compared to other currently used classification systems: the World Health Organization operational classification, the bacilloscopic index and the Ridley-Jopling classification. When analysing the usefulness of these tests in the operational classification of PB and MB leprosy for treatment and follow-up purposes, the ML Flow test was the best point-of-care test for subjects in Nepal and despite the need for sample dilution, the ML ICA test yielded better performance among Brazilian subjects. Our results identified possible ways to improve the performance of both tests.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Antigens, Bacterial/blood , Glycolipids/blood , Immunoglobulin Isotypes/blood , Leprosy/diagnosis , Mycobacterium leprae/immunology , Brazil , Case-Control Studies , Immunoassay/methods , Chromatography, Affinity/methods , Leprosy/immunology , Nepal , Predictive Value of Tests , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic , Sensitivity and Specificity
3.
Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz ; 107(supl.1): 197-208, Dec. 2012. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-659759

ABSTRACT

A variety of host immunogenetic factors appear to influence both an individual's susceptibility to infection with Mycobacterium leprae and the pathologic course of the disease. Animal models can contribute to a better understanding of the role of immunogenetics in leprosy through comparative studies helping to confirm the significance of various identified traits and in deciphering the underlying mechanisms that may be involved in expression of different disease related phenotypes. Genetically engineered mice, with specific immune or biochemical pathway defects, are particularly useful for investigating granuloma formation and resistance to infection and are shedding new light on borderline areas of the leprosy spectrum which are clinically unstable and have a tendency toward immunological complications. Though armadillos are less developed in this regard, these animals are the only other natural hosts of M. leprae and they present a unique opportunity for comparative study of genetic markers and mechanisms associable with disease susceptibility or resistance, especially the neurological aspects of leprosy. In this paper, we review the recent contributions of genetically engineered mice and armadillos toward our understanding of the immunogenetics of leprosy.


Subject(s)
Animals , Mice , Animals, Genetically Modified , Armadillos/genetics , Disease Models, Animal , Immunogenetic Phenomena/immunology , Leprosy/genetics , Leprosy/immunology , Mycobacterium leprae , Mice/genetics , Armadillos/microbiology , Mycobacterium leprae/genetics , Mycobacterium leprae/immunology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL