ABSTRACT
Objective:To optimize the topological design of locking plate for distal radial fracture so that the internal fixation stiffness can be customized.Methods:Models of both the distal radial fracture and the conventional locking plate fixation were constructed using software for three-dimensional modeling and computer-aided design. Based on the data from our previous finite element analysis, a decrease of 33.33% in axial stiffness but retention of more than 90.00% in torsional stiffness were defined as the optimization limits. The conventional plate was redesigned by way of topological optimization iterations. Finite element analysis was done to compare stiffness and interfragmentary strain (IFS) between the new optimized design and conventional design of the locking plate under both compressive and torsional loads.Results:The axial stiffness of the optimized plate was 636.5 N/mm with a downgrading magnitude of 19.7% which was close to the given limit; the torsional stiffness was 634.12 Nmm/° with a downgrading magnitude of 8.8% which remained under the given limit. In the optimized design, a more significant increase was observed in axial IFS than that in shear IFS, leading to a similar effect as the stiffness regulation did.Conclusion:The optimized design of locking plate for distal radial fracture can provide a reliable solution for customized regulation of the internal fixation stiffness.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare cortical bone screwing and Endobutton plating for the treatment of ankle joint fracture complicated with injury to the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Methods Fifty-eight pa-tients with ankle joint fracture and injury to the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis were treated at Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital to Guangdong Medical University from January 2014 to June 2016. Half of them were treated by conventional cortical bone screwing. They were 16 males and 13 females with an average age of 43.2 ± 4.1 years. The other half were treated by Endobutton plating. They were 15 males and 14 females with an average age of 44.1 ± 3.9 years. The 2 groups were compared in terms of intraoperative bleed-ing, operation time, tibiofibular clear space ( TBCS ) , tibiofibular overlap ( TBOL ) , the American Orthopedic Foot Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scale and complications. Results The cortical bone screwing group needed significantly shorter operation time (63.4 ± 5.4 min) than the plating group (89.6 ± 6.2 min) ( P ＜0.05) . There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in intraoperative bleeding ( 68.9 ± 6.3 mL versus 67.4 ± 6.4 mL ) , TBCS ( 4.6 ± 0.3 mm versus 4.7 ± 0.3 mm) , TBOL ( 7.5 ± 0.4 mm versus 7.4 ± 0.4 mm ) , good to excellent rate by AOFAS score ( 72.4% versus 75.9%) , or rate of complications ( 6.9% versus 10.3%) ( P ＞ 0.05 ). Conclusion Since cortical bone screwing and Endobutton plating show no signifi-cant difference for the treatment of ankle joint fracture complicated with distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury, a proper surgical procedure should be decided according to the specific conditions of the patient.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the suture bridge (SB) and conventional double-row (DR) suture in the repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tear.Methods From May 2013 through July 2016,48 patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tear were randomly divided into 2 even groups (n =24).SB group was repaired using the SB technique while DR group using conventional DR technique.The 2 groups were compared in terms of operation time,postoperative shoulder function scoring and incidence of re-tear.Results All the patients were followed up for 8 to 24 months (average,15.3 months).In DR group,the visual analogue scale (VAS) scores decreased from preoperative 6.3 ± 2.3 to 1.0 ± 0.4 at the last follow-up,the America Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores increased from preoperative 49.3 ± 8.5 to 90.0 ± 2.5 at the last follow-up,and the Constant scores increased from preoperative 58.7 ± 12.5 to 88.1 ± 4.0 at the last follow-up.In SB group,the VAS scores decreased from preoperative 6.0 ± 1.9 to 0.9 ± 0.8 at the last follow-up,the ASES scores increased from preoperative 50.2 ± 6.2 to 89.5 ± 3.4 at the last follow-up,and the Constant scores increased from preoperative 57.3 ± 7.5 to 90.0 ± 3.2 at the last follow-up.All the comparisons showed a significant difference between preoperation and the last follow-up (P ＜ 0.05),but an insignificant difference between the 2 groups (P ＞ 0.05).SB group used significantly less operation time (74.5 ± 19.0 min) than DR group (86.5 ± 21.0 min),and reported significantly lower incidence of re-tear (4.2％) than DR group (25.0％) (P ＜ 0.05).Conclusions In arthroscopic repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tear,SB technique shows few therapeutic advantages over conventional DR technique,but the former needs less operation time and leads to lower incidence of re-tear.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the suture bridge (SB) and conventional double-row (DR) suture in the repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tear.Methods From May 2013 through July 2016,48 patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tear were randomly divided into 2 even groups (n =24).SB group was repaired using the SB technique while DR group using conventional DR technique.The 2 groups were compared in terms of operation time,postoperative shoulder function scoring and incidence of re-tear.Results All the patients were followed up for 8 to 24 months (average,15.3 months).In DR group,the visual analogue scale (VAS) scores decreased from preoperative 6.3 ± 2.3 to 1.0 ± 0.4 at the last follow-up,the America Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores increased from preoperative 49.3 ± 8.5 to 90.0 ± 2.5 at the last follow-up,and the Constant scores increased from preoperative 58.7 ± 12.5 to 88.1 ± 4.0 at the last follow-up.In SB group,the VAS scores decreased from preoperative 6.0 ± 1.9 to 0.9 ± 0.8 at the last follow-up,the ASES scores increased from preoperative 50.2 ± 6.2 to 89.5 ± 3.4 at the last follow-up,and the Constant scores increased from preoperative 57.3 ± 7.5 to 90.0 ± 3.2 at the last follow-up.All the comparisons showed a significant difference between preoperation and the last follow-up (P ＜ 0.05),but an insignificant difference between the 2 groups (P ＞ 0.05).SB group used significantly less operation time (74.5 ± 19.0 min) than DR group (86.5 ± 21.0 min),and reported significantly lower incidence of re-tear (4.2％) than DR group (25.0％) (P ＜ 0.05).Conclusions In arthroscopic repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tear,SB technique shows few therapeutic advantages over conventional DR technique,but the former needs less operation time and leads to lower incidence of re-tear.