ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE To provide reference for the prevention and treatment of hepatitis C and the formulation and improvement of medical insurance payment policy for direct-acting antiviral （DAA） drugs. METHODS An questionnaire survey was conducted among the patients who received hepatitis C treatment in a third-grade class-A hospital in Sichuan province from 2019 to 2020 and enjoyed Chengdu medical insurance policy. The patients’ hepatitis C treatment and satisfaction with the medical insurance policy for DAA drugs were compared before and after DAA drugs were included in the medical insurance list. RESULTS A total of 203 patients effectively responded among 644 investigated patients. In terms of treatment plans， although there were significant differences in the treatment plan between patients who saw a doctor in 2019 and 2020 （P＜0.05）， the vast majority of patients were cured within the course of treatment （200 cases， 98.52%）， and there were no obvious adverse reactions （193 cases， 95.07%）. In terms of economic burden， the out-of-pocket costs and economic burden of patients treated with DAA drugs in 2020 were significantly lower than those treated with DAA drugs in 2019 （P＜0.05）； in terms of patient services， 78.82% of patients received expert consultation services from designated medical institutions， but 9.85% of patients still did not receive any patient services provided by the hospital. In terms of satisfaction with outpatient reimbursement policy， the overall satisfaction of patients who saw a doctor in 2020 （95.37%） was significantly higher than those who saw a doctor in 2019 （81.05%）（P＜0.05）. CONCLUSIONS The surveyed patients with hepatitis C obtain good efficacy after DAA drugs treatment， and are satisfied with the medical insurance policy of DAA drugs， but the standardized management of patient services in designated medical institutions is insufficient.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE To review economic studies of diabetes drugs in Chinese population systematically ，and to provide reference for promoting the development of pharmacoeconomics research in the field of diabetes and improving the research quality. METHODS Retrieving from PubMed ，Embase，SinoMed，CNKI，Wanfang data ，VIP and other databases ，the literatures on economic evaluation of diabetes drugs in Chinese population were collected ；analysis was carried out on the publication ，research content，study design of the literatures. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2013（CHEERS 2013） checklist was used for quality evaluation. RESULTS A total of 380 literatures were included ，involving 348 Chinese literatures and 32 English literatures. The first paper of diabetes drugs in Chinese population was published in 2001. The most evaluated drug was metformin. Most of the studies （79.2％）were conducted by medical institutions ，73.9％ of the studies were short-term economic evaluation，and the methods were mainly cost-effectiveness analysis （61.8％），and most of the studies did not reported clear research perspectives （82.6％）. Evaluated by CHEERS 2013，the average score of included literatures was only 10.57，and 85.8％ of the literatures was of unqualified quality. The average score of Chinese literatures was 10.05，that of English literatures was 16.23，and the reporting quality of English literatures was significantly better than that of Chinese literature s（P＜0.001）. CONCLUSIONS The existing literatures on the economic evaluation of diabetes drugs in Chinese population is of low quality. There are problems such as lack of research perspectives ，single research institution/method ，and non-standard reporting. It is recommended that medical institutions ，universities/research institutions ，enterprises，government and other institutions should strengthen cooperation ，improve their research level ，pay attention to more and newer clinically effective treatment regimens ，and promote the transformation of research results into decision-making evidence.
ABSTRACT
As suggested by regulatory feedbacks from relevant national regulatory agencies on the use of medical insurance funds, noticeable problems were found in the compliance and rationality of medical service charges among Chinese hospitals. Based on the practice of hospital management, the authors summarized common problems of various medical service charge management as reported by the management authorities at all levels. These problems referred to name-replaceable charges and affiliated charges, splitting charges, repeated charges, and multiple(false) charges. On this basis, the paper analyzed such hospital management risks incurred as regulatory penalties, fee disputes and medical disputes, as well as their internal and external causes. In the end, the paper put forward countermeasures and suggestions for reference by hospitals in their management of medical service charges.