Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Urology Annals. 2014; 6 (3): 187-191
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-152656

ABSTRACT

The recurrence of pediatric nephrolithiasis, the morbidity of repeated open surgical treatment as well as our experience in percutaneous nephrolithotomy [PNL] in adult patients, all derived us to shift to PNL for managing renal stones >1.5 cm in pediatric patients. Our aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PNL in pediatric patients. During the period of the month between May 2011 and April 2013, 38 children [47 renal units] underwent PNL for renal stones 1.5-5 cm in length. Patient demographics, stone characteristics, and clinical outcome were prospectively studied. Data of those who underwent conventional and tubeless PNL were compared. Median follow-up period was 12 months [range: 6-24]. The median age at presentation was 8-year [range: 3-12]. The operative time ranged from 30 to 120 min [median [0]. Overall stone clearance rate was [1.5% after single PNL. The median hospital stay was 3 days. Auxiliary procedures were successful for the remaining 4 patients [nephroscopic clearance in one and shockwave lithotripsy in 3]. Tubeless PNL was performed in 17 renal units with a comparable outcome to conventional ones. The perioperative complications were noted in 5/47 [10.6%] of all procedures [Clavien Grade II in 4 and Clavien Grade IIIa in 1] and were managed conservatively. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones in pediatric patients is safe and feasible if performed by a well-experienced endourologist. Tubeless PNL is a better choice for children

2.
Saudi Medical Journal. 2008; 29 (7): 1014-1017
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-100685

ABSTRACT

To determine the applicability, acceptance, and compliance of the option of clean intermittent catheterization [CIC] when needed by patients in our society. We retrospectively reviewed the files of all patients for whom CIC was conducted at King Khalid University Hospital and Security Forces Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between 1998, and 2006. We considered primary pathology, indication of CIC, age at CIC initiation, and who administered the CIC. We also documented the acceptance and compliance levels of the procedure by the patient over time. We included 280 patients, of which 118 [42%] were female and 162 [58%] were male in this study. The main pathology was myelodysplasia in 196 [70%] patients, posterior urethral valve in 52 [18.6%] patients, and non-neuropathic bladder sphincter dysfunction in 32 [11.4%] patients. The mean age was 6.49 +/- 4.25 years. Two hundred and fifty-seven [91.7%] families and their children accepted the idea of CIC, and 248 [88.6%] continued with the CIC program. Mothers were responsible for carrying out the procedure in 204 [72.9%] patients. However, in 76 [27.1%] cases, the patient was doing the procedure independently and the average age for a child to master the technique was 8 years. During the last 3 years, an urotherapist took over the educational services and performed outpatient education instead of our previous inpatient education. Clean intermittent catheterization is an appropriate method of treatment for our group of patients. They showed excellent acceptance of and compliance with the procedure, however, we suggest that for complete success, proper education, teaching, and follow-up should be conducted


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Patient Compliance , Urethral Diseases , Self Care/psychology , Urinary Catheterization/psychology , Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic/therapy , Patient Acceptance of Health Care
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL