ABSTRACT
Purpose@#The purpose of this case study series was to introduce successful implant cases that used the palatal bone in patients with severe maxillary alveolar bone atrophy or defects.Case Presentation: In this case series study, a total of four patients underwent implant placement in the palatal bone of the maxilla. A total of 6 implants were installed using the palatine bone. The patients’ ages ranged from 40 to 73 years with an average age of 63.5 years. The patients had maxillary sinus-related diseases, such as maxillary sinusitis, oroantral fistula, and dentigerous cysts, prior to implantation. To achieve initial stability, the implants were placed on the palatal side, and buccally tilted. The average postoperative recovery period was 8 months. No postoperative complications occurred in any of the cases, and the approach was used without reported issues. @*Conclusion@#Implant treatment by securing the initial fixation in the palatal bone is a good alternative when an implant must be installed in a patient who requires extensive and invasive bone graft.
ABSTRACT
Purpose@#The purpose of this case study series was to introduce successful implant cases that used the palatal bone in patients with severe maxillary alveolar bone atrophy or defects.Case Presentation: In this case series study, a total of four patients underwent implant placement in the palatal bone of the maxilla. A total of 6 implants were installed using the palatine bone. The patients’ ages ranged from 40 to 73 years with an average age of 63.5 years. The patients had maxillary sinus-related diseases, such as maxillary sinusitis, oroantral fistula, and dentigerous cysts, prior to implantation. To achieve initial stability, the implants were placed on the palatal side, and buccally tilted. The average postoperative recovery period was 8 months. No postoperative complications occurred in any of the cases, and the approach was used without reported issues. @*Conclusion@#Implant treatment by securing the initial fixation in the palatal bone is a good alternative when an implant must be installed in a patient who requires extensive and invasive bone graft.
ABSTRACT
Background@#The aim of this study was to evaluate the factors that may affect implant fixture fractures. @*Methods@#Patients who experienced implant fixture removal at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital from 2007 to 2015 due to implant fixture fracture were included. Implant/crown ratio, time of implant fracture, clinical symptoms before implant fracture, treatment of fractured implants, and the success and survival rate of the replaced implants were evaluated retrospectively. @*Results@#Thirteen implants were fractured in 12 patients. Patient mean age at the time of fracture was 59.3 years. Of the 13 implants, 7 implants were placed at our hospital, and 6 were placed at a local clinic. The mean crown/ implant ratio was 0.83:1. The clinical symptoms before fracture were screw loosening in five implants, marginal bone loss in five implants, and the presence of peri-implant diseases in five implants. All the fractured implants were removed, and 12 out of the 13 sites were re-implanted. Parafunctions were observed in two patients: one with bruxism and one with attrition due to a strong chewing habit. @*Conclusions@#Several clinical symptoms before the fracture of an implant can predict implant fixture failure. Therefore, if these clinical symptoms are observed, appropriate treatments can be taken before more serious complications result.
ABSTRACT
Objective To study the risk factors related with progressive hemorrhagic injury (PHI)after severe head injury for a view to early diagnosis and treatment for this disease and providing a basis for effective prevention. Methods In a retrospective study of 262 patients with severe brain injury in considering the clinical data of the PHI, the occurrence is variable, and age, gender, bleeding site, type of bleeding, dilated pupils starus, level of systolic blood pressure on admission, time of CT for the first time,GOS scores, injured mechanism, interval between first and second time CT, application of high-dose mannitol, platelet (PLT) count, prothrombin time (PT), activated partial prothrombin time (APTT) were considered as independent variables. Results The incidence rate of having PHI was 47.7% (125/262);single-factor analysis revealed that, as compared with those in patients with non-PHI, 7 factors in patients with PHI were significantly different, namely, age, type of hemorrhage, interval between injury and first-time CT, GCS scores, PLT count, PT and APTT. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the results showed that interval between injury and first-time CT, GCS scores, PLT count were the risk factors of having PHI, and their OR values were 3.5448, 3.2975 and 2.2361, respectively. Conclusion For patients with severe brain injury, the sooner the first time CT examination is performed, the lower the GCS scores are and the lower the PLT count is, the higher risk of having PHI is. Thus, dynamic CT formal review is suggested to improve the early diagnosis and treatment of PHI.