ABSTRACT
Objective: To get insight into the current practice of noise reduction effect of workers as they wore hearing protectors in different domestic enterprises and the possible affected factors. Methods: From October 2020 to April 2021, using a random sampling method, 1197 workers exposed to noise in petrochemical factories, textile factories, and parts manufacturing factories were selected as the study subjects. The noise reduction effect of hearing protectors worn by workers in daily use was tested using a hearing protector suitability testing system. The personal sound attenuation level (PAR) was compared among workers in three enterprises, Targeted intervention and repetitive testing were conducted for workers who did not meet the noise reduction effect required by the enterprise, and the changes in PAR of workers before and after the intervention were compared. The comparison of baseline PARs between two or more groups was performed using the Mann Whitney test, the comparison of baseline PARs with post intervention PARs was performed using the Wilcoxon signed rank sum test, and the comparison of qualitative data between two or more groups was performed using the Chi square test. Results: The median baseline PAR for all workers was 15 dB. Men, age<30 years old, education level at or above college level, working experience of 5 to 15 years, and those who used hearing protectors for 5 to 15 years had higher PARs, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The median difference in baseline PAR among workers from three enterprises was statistically significant (H=175.06, P<0.01). The median PAR of subjects who did not pass the baseline increased from 3 dB to 21 dB after intervention (Z=-27.92, P<0.01) . Conclusion: Some workers wearing hearing protectors do not meet the required PAR, and low PARs may be related to incorrect wearing methods and incorrect selection of hearing protectors. As a tool for testing, training, and assisting in selection, the hearing protector suitability testing system is of great significance for worker hearing protection.
Subject(s)
Male , Humans , Adult , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/prevention & control , Ear Protective Devices , Noise, Occupational/prevention & control , Hearing , AudiometryABSTRACT
At present, the methods for verifying the attenuation of hearing protective devices(HPDs) mainly include real-ear attenuation at threshold(REAT), microphone in real ear(MIRE), and acoustical test fixture(ATF). Among them, the REAT is the gold standard, but its testing requirements are strict and there is a physiological noise masking effect. The test results of MIRE need to be modified by transfer function of the open ear, which has the advantage of convenient operation without being affected by subjective feelings. The ATF method is mainly used to verify the shape and quality of customized HPDs since its artificial ear design cannot truly reflect the real-ear test situation. The HPD fit testing has been well developed and widely applied abroad, which has been proved to be able to accurately verify and effectively improve the attenuation of workers wearing HPDs. However, relevant research and applications have only been carried out in China in recent years. At present, the main problems in the verification of the protective effect of HPDs in China are as follows: firstly, the measurement is only limited in attenuation and fail to comprehensively consider the applicability and comfort of the HPDs; secondly, a-weighted sound pressure level is mostly used in noise monitoring in China, while the choice of HPDs is based on C-weighted-sound pressure level. The transition between these two has not been established. Future research should be devoted to solve the above problems and help the use of HPDs in preventing the hearing loss of noise-exposed workers.