ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the consistency between the iodine-unstained area and the pathological size of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) specimens of superficial esophageal cancer.Methods:A retrospective study was performed on data of 32 patients with superficial esophageal cancer who accepted ESD from May 2019 to April 2020 in the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine. The maximum transverse diameter and maximum longitudinal diameter of the iodine-unstained area were compared with the tumor pathological area. A size difference no more than 0.5 cm was considered as conformity, any difference between 0.5 and 1.0 cm was considered as non-conformity, and any difference no less than 1.0 cm was considered as serious non-conformity. At the same time, pink sign after spraying Lugo solution and the consistency of pink sign area with the iodine free area were observed.Results:A total of 32 patients with 33 lesions were enrolled in this study, including 23 males and 9 females and the age of the patients was 59.5±7.3 years. There were 19 (57.6%) lesions whose size of iodine-unstained area was consistent with the tumor pathological area. These 19 lesions were all positive for the pink sign, and the pink sign area overlapped with the iodine-unstained area. In addition, 4 (12.1%) iodine-unstained areas of the lesions did not match the size of the pathological area, and 10 (30.3%) iodine-unstained areas of the lesions were seriously inconsistent with the size of the pathological area. These 14 (42.4%) lesions were all positive for pink sign, and the pink sign area was significantly smaller than the iodine-unstained area. Among the 14 discordant lesions, 2 lesions underwent ESD according to the iodine-unstained area, which resulted in excessive resection and postoperative stenosis.Conclusion:Determining the extent of superficial esophageal cancer by iodine-unstained areas before ESD may lead to excessive resection of the lesions, which is related to the fact that the iodine-unstained areas of the lesions are sometimes significantly larger than the pink sign areas. Therefore, in order to achieve precise treatment, endoscopists can choose the iodine-unstained area with positive pink sign as the first choice for resection.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To explore the diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for duodenal accessory papilla.Methods:Data of 122 cases of duodenal accessory papilla diagnosed by EUS at the endoscopy center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine from February 28, 2006 to February 28, 2018 were analyzed and summarized.Results:Of the 122 duodenal accessory papilla cases, the age was 52.1±12.9, with more males than females. The most common site of duodenal accessory papillae was the descending part above the papilla (88/122, 72.13%), followed by the junction of duodenal bulb and descending part (29/122, 23.77%), and a small proportion of lesions located in the duodenal bulb (5/122, 4.10%). Duodenal accessory papillae were all solitary, whose diameter mostly ranged 0.5-1.0 cm (88/122, 72.13%), a smaller proportion of diameter larger than 1.0 cm (23/122, 18.85%), and only a few with diameter less than 0.5 cm (11/122, 9.02%). Most duodenal accessory papillae were hypoechoic (71/122, 58.20%) or moderate to low echogenic (35/122, 28.68%), and the echoes were mostly homogeneous. The mucosa layer was smooth, with a sphincteroid structure in the submucosa and below. The boundary of the duodenal accessory papillae was mostly clear (121/122, 99.18%) and characteristic lacunar cavity structures were often seen in the center (83/122, 68.03%). The surrounding intestinal wall was normal and no associated enlarged lymph nodes were found around the intestine.Conclusion:EUS can clearly show the structure of duodenal accessory papilla and adjacent organs, and is of high value for the diagnosis of duodenal accessory papilla.