Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 2016; 32 (4): 955-960
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-182513

ABSTRACT

Objective: There is a strong positive association between increased low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C] and coronary heart disease [CHD]


The accuracy of LDL-C estimation is essential and critically important. The aim of present study was to compare calculated LDL-C with direct homogeneous assay in patients with type 2 diabetes


Methods: This observational study was carried out at Baqai Institute of Diabetology and Endocrinology [BIDE] from January 2011 to December 2013. A total of 9620 patients with type 2 diabetes were included in the study


Fasting blood glucose, total Cholesterol, triglyceride, HDL cholesterol and LDL cholesterol were obtained using standard methods. Calculated LDL-C was obtained by Friedewald formula


Results: Mean difference of measured and calculated LDL-C was found to be -0.25, 6.63 and 46.55 mg/dl at triglyceride levels < 150 mg/dl, 150 - 400 mg/dl and > 400 mg/dl, respectively


The result shows that the difference between measured and calculated LDL-C increases as the triglyceride level increases


Conclusions: The findings of our study suggested that calculated LDL-C was lower, as compared to measured LDL-C, which may cause misclassifications that may have an impact on therapeutic decisions in patients with diabetes. Calculated LDL-C may depend on triglyceride levels so LDL-C should be measured by direct assay in routine clinical laboratories

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL