ABSTRACT
Background: Laparoscopic gastrectomy has several difficult points including,lymph node dissection and resection of several blood vessels for trainee surgeons.Recently, preoperative evaluation of vasculature based three-dimensional (3D)imaging technique resulted in a significantly improved clinical outcome inabdominal surgery. The aim of this study is to investigate the usefulness of the 3Dimage in laparoscopic gastrectomy for trainee surgeons.Method: We adopted a multiphase CT protocol to acquire 3 image sets (arterial,portal, and equilibrium phases). 3D-reconstruction of gastric vasculature wasmade using data from a contrast enhanced MDCT and SYNAPSE VINCENTsoftware. Whole pancreas, spleen, gastric vasculature were extracted from MDCTscans and traced. Thirty three patients, who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomyfor gastric cancer during the period between Jan 2013 and May 2014 wereexamined in this study. Four trainees performed a 19 laparoscopic gastrectomy,while 14 laparoscopic gastrectomy were conducted by the two trainers. Thesurgical outcomes in both groups and the pattern of gastric vasculatures wereevaluated.Result: 3D imaging technique showed a correct positional relationship betweenthe stomach, gastric vessels, pancreas and spleen. Surgical outcome includingestimated blood loss, and operative time in trainee group were not significantlydifferent compared to trainer group. 3D imaging technique showed a correctpositional relationship between the stomach, gastric vessels, pancreas and spleen.Regarding vascular pattern detected by 3D imaging, the origins of IPA were RGEAin 12 cases (36%), GDA in 8 cases (24%).bifurcation of RGEA and GDA in7 cases(21%), and not detected in 1 case (3%), respectively. The types of confluence ofIPV were RGEV in 16 cases (48%), ASPDV in 10 cases (30%), and not detectedin 7 cases (21%), respectively.Conclusions: 3D imaging technique might contribute to successful laparoscopicgastrectomy. Preoperative 3D-simulation techniques enabled trainee surgeons toeasily and safely perform laparoscopic gastrectomy.
ABSTRACT
Background: The glissonean pedicle approach was introduced by Couinaud and Takasaki in the early 1980s. The key of the glissonean pedicle approach is clamping the pedicle first, secondly confirming the territory, and finally dissecting the liver parenchyma. In this presentation, we introduced our recent refinements of glissonean pedicle approach for liver resection. “Approach to the glissonean pedicles at the hepatic hilus” Couinaud described three approaches to the hepatic hilus. 1) Intra-fascial access (Control method): The conventional dissection at the hilus or within the sheath is referred to as intrafascial access However, dissection performed under the hilar plate is dangerous and surgeons have to consider any variations of the hepatic artery and bile ducts. 2) Extra-fascial access (Glissonean pedicle approach): The glissonean pedicle is dissected from the liver parenchyma at the hepatic hilus before dissecting the liver parenchyma. This procedure prevents intrahepatic metastasis of HCC, which spreads along the portal vein and improves the overall survival after surgery. 3) Extra-fascial and transfissural access: If the main portal fissure or the left suprahepatic fissure is opened after dissecting the liver parenchyma, the surgeon can confirm the pedicles that arise from the hilar plate or the umbilical plate. “Operative techniques” 1) Preoperative 3D simulation of the precise anatomy of portal vein, hepatic artery and bile duct at hepatic hilus should be performed. 2) Right glissonean pedicle: The hilar plate is detached from the quadrate lobe. The assistant pulls the liver parenchyma cranially and the operator conversely pulls the hepatoduodenal ligament caudally. Mayo scissors are inserted along the liver parenchyma between the liver parenchyma and glissonean capsule (Fig.1). Then forceps are inserted in the same way and the right main pedicle is taped (Fig.2). The right anterior and posterior glissonean pedicles are taped as well. 3) Left glissonean pedicle: The hilar plate is detached from the liver parenchyma. Then, the Arantius duct is confirmed and the left pedicle is dissected along the left pedicle at the ventral side of the Arantius duct. “Pitfall of glissonean pedicle approach” The right pedicle should be dissected in the liver side as much as possible to prevent the injury of left hepatic duct. If possible, the right pedicle is recommended to be dissected at the level of the second branches separately (Fig.3). The right posterior hepatic duct sometimes branches from the left hepatic duct and the Arantius duct is confirmed and the left pedicle should be dissected along the left pedicle at the ventral side of the Arantius duct because the right posterior hepatic duct branches from the left hepatic duct at the dorsal side of Arantius’ duct. In addition, the intraoperative cholangiogram should be used in the case with the abnormal anatomy of bile duct. Conclusions: Any anatomical hepatectomy can be performed using “glissonean pedicle approach” which allows simple, safe and easy liver resection.
ABSTRACT
Background: Laparoscopic gastrectomy has several difficult points including, lymph node dissection and resection of several blood vessels for trainee surgeons. Recently, preoperative evaluation of vasculature based three-dimensional (3D) imaging technique resulted in a significantly improved clinical outcome in abdominal surgery. The aim of this study is to investigate the usefulness of the 3D image in laparoscopic gastrectomy for trainee surgeons. Method: We adopted a multiphase CT protocol to acquire 3 image sets (arterial, portal, and equilibrium phases). 3D-reconstruction of gastric vasculature was made using data from a contrast enhanced MDCT and SYNAPSE VINCENT software. Whole pancreas, spleen, gastric vasculature were extracted from MDCT scans and traced. Thirty three patients, who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer during the period between Jan 2013 and May 2014 were examined in this study. Four trainees performed a 19 laparoscopic gastrectomy, while 14 laparoscopic gastrectomy were conducted by the two trainers. The surgical outcomes in both groups and the pattern of gastric vasculatures were evaluated. Result: 3D imaging technique showed a correct positional relationship between the stomach, gastric vessels, pancreas and spleen. Surgical outcome including estimated blood loss, and operative time in trainee group were not significantly different compared to trainer group. 3D imaging technique showed a correct positional relationship between the stomach, gastric vessels, pancreas and spleen. Regarding vascular pattern detected by 3D imaging, the origins of IPA were RGEA in 12 cases (36%), GDA in 8 cases (24%).bifurcation of RGEA and GDA in7 cases (21%), and not detected in 1 case (3%), respectively. The types of confluence of IPV were RGEV in 16 cases (48%), ASPDV in 10 cases (30%), and not detected in 7 cases (21%), respectively. Conclusions: 3D imaging technique might contribute to successful laparoscopic gastrectomy. Preoperative 3D-simulation techniques enabled trainee surgeons to easily and safely perform laparoscopic gastrectomy.